The purpose of this retrospective study, is to demonstrate the survivorship and clinical effectiveness of the Wallis implant, against low back pain and functional disability in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disease.

The Wallis Interspinous implant, was developed as a minimally invasive and anatomically conserving procedure, without recourse to rigid fusion procedures. The initial finite element analysis and cadaver biomechanical studies showed that the Wallis ligament improves stability in the degenerate lumbar motion segment. Unloading the disc and facet joints reduces intradiscal pressures at same and adjacent levels allowing for the potential of the disc to repair itself.

A total of 157 patients who had wallis ligament insertion between 2003 and 2009 were reviewed, with a mean age of 54 and were followed for 48 months on average.

Patients were assessed pre-operatively and post-operatively every 6 months by VAS pain score, Oswestry Disability Index and SF-36.

90% of patients improved, to show a minimal clinical difference, compared to the pre-operative evaluation. There is overall 75-80% good clinical outcome.

Low infection rate of 1.1%. Two cases of prolapsed discs at the same level requiring further discectomy, 7 required fusion. No fractures or expulsions.

The Wallis implant represents a safe non-fusion stabilisation device in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine disease with canal stenosis. There is less soft tissue damage, quick rehabilitation, less morbidity and associated low complication rate.

Introduction: Traditionally flexion deformities in Proximal Interphalangeal joints of lesser toes like hammer toes and curly toes are treated with fusing the PIP joint with a single Large Kwire. We describe a new technique of fusing PIP joints using two 1.1mm K wires.

The advantages of this technique over single K wire are:

Less post operative complications like pain and pin tract infection.

Aim: To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes in two pin fusions with standard single pin fusions described by Coughlin. To prove that this is a technically and biomechanical better procedure.

Materials and Methods: Two pin technique was used for 36 PIP joint fusions in 25 patients with a mean age of 58 years (range–42 to 87 years) and female preponderance. Results were analysed using foot function scale, AOFAS (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society) lesser metatarsophalageal-Interphalageal scale. Post operative complications were documented.

Technique: Dorsal skin incision was used to approach the PIP joint. Articular surfaces were prepared and two 1.1mm K wires were inserted from the tip of the toe and joint fixed in 15 – 20 degrees of flexion which is optimal functional position of PIP joint. Patients were mobilised non weight bearing for 6 weeks when K wires were removed and weight bearing started.

Results: The results were analysed at 3–6 months post operatively. The foot function scores and objective parameters of AOFAS scores are slightly better in two pin fusions compared with single pin fusions.

Objective parameters of AOFAS scale like adduction/ abduction, flexion, rotational deformities are significantly less with two wire fusions compared with single wire procedures (Coughlin et al). Radiological analysis of the foot showed that 97% had bony union compared 81% with single pin, and only 3% had fibrous union compared to 19% with single wire. Both the procedures didn’t have any non-unions. Only one patient had superficial wound infection, and surprisingly none had pin tract infection.

Conclusion: Two pin PIP Joint fusion is relatively easy procedure with many technical advantages over single pin technique. The clinical and radiological outcomes are good. Results of the biomechanical studies should be available soon.

Introduction: Hip fractures are a massive problem in an ageing population with 7–21 million predicted world-wide by 2025. The stabilization of intertrochanteric fractures reduces morbidity, mortality and allows mobilization. The treatment of these fractures has evolved over the past 50 years to the Sliding hip screw and plate, and intramedullary devices Current evidence suggests that the SHS systems are superior in stable fracture patterns and intramedullary devices are superior in unstable fracture patterns such as reverse oblique fractures or subtrochanteric fractures. Accurate implant positioning will prevent failure and the associated morbidity and mortality. The most frequent failure is due to cut out of the screw through the femoral head due to poor positioning. Cut out is directly correlated with tip apex distance (TAD). A TAD < 25mm has been to shown to be key to preventing cut out irrespective of fixation device.

Aims: The aims of this audit were to review TAD in proximal femoral fractures stabilized with a SHS system at one hospital to ensure:

TAD is < 25mm.

Results: Radiographs over a period of 1 year where reviewed. There were 86 cases of SHS fixation. 72% of cases were female (62:24). The mean age was 84(65 to 97). The mean preoperative delay before surgery was 4.5 range (0 –15). 13% of cases (11/86) had no postoperative radiographs either digitally or hard copies stored in the notes. The mean value of TAD was 20.8mm (Std dev 6.89). There was no correlation between fracture patterns and TAD, or surgeon grade and TAD. However there was a trend for higher TAD in inexperienced surgeons and in more complex fracture patterns.

The majority of cases were operated on by Registrars 67%, Staff grade 15%, Research fellows 9%, SHOs 6% and Consultant grades 3%. Registrars achieved Centre–Centre positions in 62% of cases with staff grade 47% of cases. The majority of SHS were performed for Types 2 and 4 according to Jensen & Michaelson classification. SHS implants were used in one subtrochanteric fracture and zero reverse oblique fractures. 21 cases had a TAD> 25mm and one of these has gone on to failure, requiring THR.

Conclusion: The mean TAD was within recommendations and there was no correlation between surgeon grade, fracture pattern and TAD. The positioning of screws corresponds closely to published data and remains acceptable as does the use of SHS devices. Both the preoperative delay and number of inadequate radiographs is unacceptable and needs improvement.

Background: A common problem achieving lumbar spinal fusion is developing a pseudarthrosis. The current gold standard in achieving fusion is the use of autograft from pelvis or posterior elements of the spine. However the potential limitations of insufficient quantity and donor site morbidity have led to the use of bone graft alternatives such as DBM which contains osteoinductive BMPs.

Aims & Methods: A prospective randomized control trial comparing the effectiveness of Demineralised Bone Matrix (DBM Putty)/autograft composite with autograft in lumbar postero-lateral or 270 degree spinal fusion.

35 patients were required for the study. They were randomized to have DBM and autograft on one side of the posterior approach and autograft alone on other side of the same approach. Patients were followed up with interval radiographs for total of 24mons. To date 32 patients have been recruited and with an average follow up a15.3 months. The mineralization of fusion mass lateral to the instrumentation on each side was graded as Absent, Mild (< 50%), Moderate (> 50%) or Complete fusion (100%). The assessment was made by independent orthopaedic consultant and a musculoskeletal radiologist who were blinded to graft assignment.

Results: The sex distribution was 17:15 male to females with a mean age of 55.2 (21–87years) and an average follow up of 15.3mons (3–24mons). 50% of patients had single level fusion and the remainder had more than one level fusion. At 12months, on the side of DBM 28% had complete fusion, 65% had moderate fusion, and 7% had no fusion mass. During the same period on the other side (non DBM side) approx 25% did not show any sign of fusion. There was no correlation with number of levels, age or sex.

Conclusions: Osteoinductive properties of DBM would appear to enhance the consolidation of the lumbar spinal fusion. DBM reduces the amount of harvested autograft graft and also minimises the morbidity of donor site complications.

Aim: To assess the outcome of patients with chronic discogenic lumbar back pain who underwent intradiscal electro thermal therapy (IDET).

Design: A prospective longitudinal study

Subjects: Patients undergoing IDET in our unit between April 2000 and October 2007 were included in the study after assessment with discography and diagnostic imaging. Discographic concordant symptoms with subsequent abolition with local anaesthetic led to inclusion in the study regardless of discogram volume.

Outcome Measures: Subjects were assessed preoperatively with VAS pain scores, SF36, demographic data and pain diagrams. Then were then reassessed postoperatively with the, VAS pain scores SF36, employment status and subjective outcome at 6, and 12 months.

Results: 83 patients were treated with IDET. We had a follow up rate of 75% leaving a cohort of 65 patients. Mean follow up 7.6 months.

Overall there was a mean improvement in pain VAS scores of 1.9 (p=0.0875).

SF36 scores showed minimal improvement in both physical and mental parameters and there was minimal improvement in subjective outcome in 55% of patients.

However it was observed that a small subgroup of patients (30%) aged less than 40 with low volume positive discography and single level disease mean pain VAS scores improved by 3.78 from 7.52 to 3.74. 72% of these patients reported a subjective improvement in symptoms and SF36 scores improved significantly compared to the overall group.

Further analysis also revealed that the use of pain diagrams when interpreted according to the principles of Mann et al was the predictive value.

Conclusions: Patient selection seems to be crucial in determining a successful outcome using IDET. We still perform this procedure on those patients aged less than 40 with single level disease, positive low volume discography, no facet joint arthritis and an organic pre procedure pain diagram.

Hallux valgus is a common condition and surgical correction has remained a challenge. Scarf osteotomy with Akin procedure is well accepted method. Akin procedure gives spurious correction of the distal alignment of big toe. This study was performed to see alternative way to get best correction without additional phalangeal procedure. Senior author used innovative Y-V medial capsulorraphy with standard Scarf osteotomy. This technique allows reduction of MP joint along with correction of pronation deformity and reduction of sesamoids.

We report the use of a modified Y-V medial capsular repair in association with Scarf osteotomy for Hallux valgux in 45 patients (55 feet) aged 18 to 76 years (mean 43 years) between October 2004 and December 2005. Clinical follow up was both subjective and objective. Patients were asked about rating of their satisfaction and objective assessment was done in form of AOFAS score. Using this technique none of the patients required an additional proximal phalangeal osteotomy with metatarsal osteotomy. At six months follow up American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score improved from 46 to 87. Intermetatarsal (IM) angle and the hallux valgus (HV) angle improved from 16° to 9° and from 31° to 16° respectively (p< 0.05). At final follow up 8 patients were very satisfied, 12 were satisfied while 5 were not satisfied.

Of the 55 procedures 51 did not develop any complications. Two had superficial infections, treated successfully with oral antibiotics only. Two patients had recurrence, one was treated with Akin and second patient declined surgery as she was not bothered with it.

We recommend the use of this modified ‘Y-V’ medial capsular repair to reduce the need for an additional procedure to augment the correction achieved during Scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus. This reduces hallux valgus angle and maintains it.