To compare preoperative and postoperative Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) scores in operated Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) patients with and without concomitant isthmic spondylolisthesis.

A retrospective study of a prospective cohort of 464 individuals undergoing AIS surgery between 2008 and 2018 was performed. All patients undergoing surgery for AIS with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included. We excluded patients with prior or concomitant surgery for spondylolisthesis. HRQoL scores were measured using the SRS-22 questionnaire. Comparisons were performed between AIS patients with vs. without concomitant spondylolisthesis treated non-surgically.

AIS surgery was performed for 36 patients (15.2 ±2.5 y.o) with concomitant isthmic spondylolisthesis, and 428 patients (15.5 ±2.4 y.o) without concomitant spondylolisthesis. The two groups were similar in terms of age, sex, preoperative and postoperative Cobb angles. Preoperative and postoperative HRQoL scores were similar between the two groups. HRQoL improved significantly for all domains in both groups, except for pain in patients with spondylolisthesis. There was no need for surgical treatment of the spondylolisthesis and no slip progression during the follow-up duration after AIS surgery.

Patients undergoing surgical treatment of AIS with non-surgical management of a concomitant isthmic spondylolisthesis can expect improvement in HRQoL scores, similar to that observed in patients without concomitant spondylolisthesis.

There is a significant positive association between hours of brace wear and rate of success in the treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS). The abandon rate reported in the literature averages 18%. In a recent randomized trial conducted at our center; the abandon rate was 4%. We aim to document the abandon rate towards brace treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on AIS progression.

We reviewed a database of AIS patients recruited between March and September 2020. Inclusion criteria were patients with AIS under brace treatment according to SRS criteria. The patients were divided in 2 cohorts: those with a self-reported good adherence to treatment and those who voluntarily abandoned treatment during follow-up. Patients with irregular adherence were excluded. Data analysis included age, gender, Risser stage, type of brace, Cobb angles at first visit and last follow-up (mean 11 months) and % of progression. Unpaired student tests were used for comparison.

154 patients met inclusion criteria. 20 patients were excluded due to irregular adherence. 89 patients (age: 12.1 y.o. ±1.4) reported good adherence to treatment, while 45 patients (age: 12.6 y.o. ±1.5) abandoned treatment, an abandon rate of 29%. The cohort of compliant patients started treatment with a mean main thoracic (MT) curve of 26° and finished with 27°. The mean difference between measurements was +0.65°±7.5; mean progression rate was −4.6%. However, patients who abandoned treatment started with a mean MT curve of 28° and finished with 33°, with a mean increase of +5°±8 and a mean progression rate of −11%. The differences between the 2 cohorts were statistically significant (p=0.002). Five (5) patients from the abandon group were offered for surgery because of curve progression.

The abandon rate of brace treatment in AIS significantly increased during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic. Patients who voluntarily discontinued treatment had significant increases in curve progression and surgical indication rates.

Referral patterns in spine clinic of young patients with suspected scoliosis is suboptimal with 19% of late referrals and 42% of inappropriate referrals. Patients' triage and prioritisation in spine clinic is a strategy to ensure that health care allocation is done according to the level of health needs, favoring effective management and efficient use of health care resources use. The objective of the study is to elaborate a model for triage and prioritisation of young patients in spine clinic based on expert consensus and literature on best practices.

This projects was structured in three parts: 1)We documented best evidence. We conducted a review of empirical studies evaluating triage and prioritisation initiatives in order to identify key components for intervention success. 2)We elaborate a model of health care delivery with the professionals of a local paediatric spine clinic. In this model, the triage and prioritisation algorithm was developed from list of potential factors (demographics, signs and perceived symptoms, provisional diagnoses and known co-morbidities, results of preliminary physical examination and radiological findings) that was submitted to five paediatric orthopaedic surgeons for rating according to their potential relevance to orient prioritisation decisions. 3) We compared the professionals' model of health care delivery to the literature synthesis in order to propose the best model.

Seven key components of triage and prioritisation systems were identified: centralised review of referral requests, list of consensual objectives criteria for triage, fast track evaluation of urgent cases, selection of cases for management at point of triage, cases prioritisation to main consultant, multidisciplinary evaluation and alternatives pathways. The consensual decision algorithm confirmed that cases who should be seen in priority are immature patients presenting with a significant trunk deformity. In addition, presence of persisting neurological symptoms, severe incapacitating pain or night pain, as well as abnormal scan or MRI findings were considered as urgent/PI priority. Cases characteristics for evaluation by nurse practitioners as well as alternative pathways of management were defined. Acceptability, compatibility, clinical relevance and discriminant capacity of the new model of health care delivery were satisfactorily demonstrated.

Consensus was easily reached between the five respondents on factors supporting decisions to prioritise patients in spine clinic for suspected spinal deformity. Refinements to the initially proposed model according the identified key features from the literature, led to a final model of health care delivery that is evidence-base, feasible and coherent with the local context. Future implementation of this model should facilitate timely and appropriate health care delivery and best use of health care resources according to patients' needs.