header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 100-B, Issue 1 | Pages 101 - 108
1 Jan 2018
Stevenson JD Kumar VS Cribb GL Cool P

Aims

Dislocation rates are reportedly lower in patients requiring proximal femoral hemiarthroplasty than for patients undergoing hip arthroplasty for neoplasia. Without acetabular replacement, pain due to acetabular wear necessitating revision surgery has been described. We aimed to determine whether wear of the native acetabulum following hemiarthroplasty necessitates revision surgery with secondary replacement of the acetabulum after proximal femoral replacement (PFR) for tumour reconstruction.

Patients and Methods

We reviewed 100 consecutive PFRs performed between January 2003 and January 2013 without acetabular resurfacing. The procedure was undertaken in 74 patients with metastases, for a primary bone tumour in 20 and for myeloma in six. There were 48 male and 52 female patients, with a mean age of 61.4 years (19 to 85) and median follow-up of two years (interquartile range (IQR) 0.5 to 3.7 years). In total, 52 patients presented with a pathological fracture and six presented with failed fixation of a previously instrumented pathological fracture.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 47 - 47
1 Feb 2012
Kumar VS Kinmont C Day A Bircher M
Full Access

Crescent fractures are represented by a spectrum of morphological fracture patterns, sharing a common mechanism of injury. We propose three distinct types according to the extent of Sacroiliac (SI) joint involvement and the size of the crescent fragment, which enables a pragmatic choice of surgical approach and stabilisation technique.

Crescent fractures are fracture dislocations of the SI joint in which there is variable amount of disruption of the SI ligaments extending proximally as a fracture of the posterior iliac wing. We identified three groups of Crescent fractures according to the extent of SI joint involvement, relationship of the fracture line to the S1 and S2 nerve root foramina on anteroposterior and outlet plain radiograph views, and CT films. Type I involves the less than inferior third of the SI joint with a large posterior iliac fragment left attached to the sacrum. This is best approached anteriorly for stabilisation. Type II has between one-third to two-thirds involvement of the SI joint and is treated according to Helfet's technique. Type III has a very small crescent fragment left attached to the sacrum and the inferior two-thirds of the SI joint is disrupted. This is treated with percutaneous SI screws, but will need anterior open reduction in delayed presentations. Based on this, we treated sixteen patients and followed them for at least two years. There were four Type I, four Type II and eight Type III fractures. Fifteen had anatomical reduction and stabilisation of the SI joint with good functional results. Delayed referral, the presence of significant soft tissue injury posteriorly and infected external fixator pins.

From our experience we would like to propose this functional classification of crescent fractures which we find useful in making a choice of surgical approach and stabilisation technique to achieve satisfactory reduction and stabilisation of sacroiliac joint.