Many studies have looked at the effect of titanium versus cobalt chrome baseplates on backside wear. However, the surface finish of the materials is usually different [1,2]. There may also be subtle locking mechanism design changes [2]. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the wear performance of polyethylene inserts when mated with titanium baseplates to cobalt chrome baseplates, where both have non-polished topside surfaces and an identical locking mechanism. A total of three trays per material were used. The titanium trays are intended for cementless application and include a porous titanium surface on the underside, while the cobalt chrome trays are intended for cemented applications. All trays were Triathlon design (Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ). Tibial inserts were manufactured from GUR 1020 polyethylene then vacuum/flush packaged and sterilized in nitrogen (30 kGy). Cobalt chrome femoral components were articulated against the tibial inserts. Surface roughness of the baseplates was measured prior to testing using white light interferometry (Zygo, Middlefield, CT). A 6-station knee simulator (MTS, Eden Prairie, MN) was used for testing. A normal walking profile was applied [3]. Testing was conducted for 1 million cycles. A lubricant of Alpha Calf Fraction serum (Hyclone Labs, Logan, UT) diluted to 50% with a pH-balanced 20-mMole solution of deionized water and EDTA was used [4]. The serum solution was replaced and inserts were weighed for wear every 0.5 million cycles. Standard test protocols were used for cleaning, weighing, and assessing the wear loss [5]. Soak control specimens were used to correct for fluid absorption. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student's t-test (p < 0.05).INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
