Purpose: Fractures of the distal tibia are high energy fractures, associated with marked soft-tissue trauma. Management of these fractures is challenging. The purpose of this study is to present our experience on the treatment of these fractures using hybrid external fixation, with or without open reduction and minimal internal fixation of the fibular fracture.

Patients and Methods: Forty eight patients with a distal tibial fracture were admitted to the authors’ institution since 2005. There were 33 men and 15 women. According to AO there were 24 A, 10 B and 14 C fractures. The mean age of the patients was 45.6 years. Eight patients had an open pilon fracture; according to the Gustilo classification, 1 patient had a grade I, 5 patients had a grade II, and 2 patients had a grade III open fracture. In all patients, the pilon fracture was treated using hybrid external fixation; in 18 patients, open reduction and minimal internal fixation of the fibular fracture using plate and screws was also done.

Results: Mean follow-up was 14 months (range, 9 to 36 months). In all patients, the mean duration of the application of the external fixation was 2.85 months, followed by the application of a below-knee cast. In 42 patients, radiographic evidence of union was observed at 3,6 months (range, 3 to 9 months). Time for union was different between patients with closed and grade I open fractures compared to patients with grade II and grade III open fractures (union at 3.5 and 6 months, respectively). There were 5 non-unions (10,4%) with 3 of them septic (6,25%). All three deep infections were low grade and occurred in open fractures.Delayed union was observed in 3 patients; in these patients, solid union of the fracture was observed at 7 months (range, 6 to 9 months). Pin track infection was observed in 7 patients (14.6%).

Conclusion: Based on the present study, hybrid external is associated with satisfactory results for the management of distal tibial fractures with acceptable complications.

Purpose: The goal of this prospective study was to evaluate the results of arthroscopic meniscal repair with the FasT-Fix repair system.

Type of study: Prospective case series.

Methods: 83 meniscal repairs with the FasT-Fix meniscal repair system in 80 patients with a mean age of 29 years were performed between 2001 and 2004. Concurrent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction was performed in 70% of the cases. All tears were longitudinal and located in the red/red or red/white zone. Criteria for clinical success included absence of joint line tenderness, locking, swelling, and a negative McMurray test. Clinical evaluation included also the Lyscholm knee score, and KT-1000 arthrometry.

Results: The average follow-up was 38 months (range, 24–61 months). Six of 83 repaired menisci (7.23%) were considered failures according to our criteria. Therefore, the success rate was 92.77%. Time required for meniscal repair averaged 15 minutes. Postoperatively, the majority of the patients had no restrictions in sports activities. 92% had an excellent or good result according to the Lysholm knee score. Four patients had a restriction of knee joint motion postoperatively, and an arthroscopic arthrolysis was performed in one of them. Analysis showed that, age, length of tear, simultaneous ACL reconstruction, chronicity of injury, and location of tear did not affect the clinical outcome.

Conclusions: Our results, shows that arthroscopic meniscal repair with the FasT-Fix repair system provides a high rate of meniscus healing and offers reduction of both the risk of serious neurovascular complications and operative time.

The purpose of this study was to propose a new classification based on the structural, anatomical and biomechanical properties of the odontoid process, to evaluate the outcome and to suggest the adequate treatment in relation to the specific fracture type.

The files of 97 patients with odontoid process fractures admitted to our institution were reviewed. The external and internal anatomy of the axis has been studied. The fractures were classified according to the proposed new classification. The method was tested for reliability and validity. Mean follow-up was 14 years.

Intraobserver and interobserver agreement was excellent with intraclass correlation coefficients at levels of 0.98 and 0.85 respectively. Four types of odontoid process fractures are distinguished; type A fractures are avulsion fractures involving the tip of the odontoid; type B fractures are fractures of the neck between the lower edge of the transverse ligament and the line connecting the medial corners of the upper articular facets of the axis; type C fractures involve the area between the previously mentioned line and the base of the odontoid process (type C1) or extend to the body of the axis (type C2); type D fractures are complex fractures involving more than one level of the odontoid process.

Classification of odontoid process fractures has to be reconsidered as novel imaging technology has shown new patterns of fractures. Computed tomography scan with image reconstruction is mandatory. The analysis of the imaging data in the present study justifies the new classification.