To demonstrate the effect of location of the split of the plaster on the raised intercompartmental pressure in the volar and dorsal compartments. Artificial forearm skeleton was used along with two half litre saline bags on ether side representing volar and dorsal forearm compartment. A single layer of cotton wool with half width overlap was applied followed by three rolls of 10cm x 2.5 m plaster of paris. This was then left to dry for four hours. Both the saline bags had an eighteen gauge catheter inserted that was connected to the central venous pressure monitoring line on the anaesthetic machine. Baseline pressure in mmHg was recorded. Normal saline was then injected in both the bags so as to raise the pressure to 50 mmHg in each compartment. POP cast was then split, spread and then the wool was cut down to the saline bags while continually monitoring the pressures. The respective change in the pressure at the end of each step was recorded. Six simulated forearm models had dorsal splits and an equal number had volar splits. The effect of the site and various steps of splitting on the drop in respective compartment pressures was compared.Aim
Methods
Back pain is a major cause of disability and absence from work. 80% of the population will experience back pain at some point in their lives. In our study we looked at 2 randomised groups of patients. Group 1 patients had only epidural steroid injections (ESI) and group 2 patients had ESI plus radiofrequency (RF). We hypothesized that there is no difference in outcome between group 1 and 2 patients. The 2 groups were sent out a retrospective questionnaire which had 5 parts to it, including SF-36 health survey, pain drawing chart, visual analogue scale (VAS), oswestry disability score (ODS) and a patient satisfaction questionnaire. The patients had treatment between 2002 and 2003 and the post-treatment questionnaires were sent out in May 2004. The SF-36 was scored giving a physical component score (PCS) and a mental component score (MCS) using an online scoring website. The groups studied were from 2 different referral hospitals. The patients were randomised by GP referral being sent to the 2 different hospitals. 115 questionnaires with stamped addressed envelopes were sent out to group 1 patients, out of which 71 were returned (61.7%) and 113 to group 2 patients out of which 55 were returned (48.7%). Statistical analysis was done using the SPSS software programme. As there was some evidence of non-normality Mann-Whitney test was carried out, and for the patient satisfaction questionnaire, chi-squared and fisher’s exact test was used. We found that there was a significant difference among the 2 groups in the PCS (p<
0.0005) and MCS (p=0.017). There was a statistically significant difference among the 2 groups in their pain draw score, VAS and ODS with p values of <
0.0005. In the patient satisfaction questionnaire, 8 questions were asked. Patients were asked to assess how successful the spinal injection was. 35 (67%) patients from group 2 said it was successful, compared with 25 (37%) patients from group 1. 9 (17%) patients from group 2 said it was not successful compared with 27 (40%) patients from group 1. 8 (15%) patients were not sure from group 2 and 16 (24%) were not sure from group 1. The difference was statistically significant with a p value of 0.003. When asked whether they would recommend this type of injection, more patients from group 2 said they would (p=0.029). When asked about the duration of effectiveness of the injection, group 2 noticed an increased duration of benefit compared with group 1 (p<
0.0005). There was no significant difference between the groups when asked how many injections were required (p=0.089) or when asked whether or not they required painkillers (p=0.062). However, more patients from group 2 said that painkillers controlled their pain (p=0.001). When asked if they were able to return to work and do housework/gardening after injection, there were significantly more patients from group 2 being able to do so (p<
0.0005). We conclude that in the patients studied, the group who had radiofrequency treatment and epidural steroid injection did better as compared with patients who had epidural steroid injection alone.
