LCPD can cause femoral head deformity and osteoarthritis requiring total hip replacement (THR). Currently, there is little data on how patients are functioning after a THR from patients’ perspective. The purpose of this study was to collect a large patient-reported outcome data set on adults with LCPD, including those who had a THR, using a Web-survey method and to compare their outcomes to a normative population. An English REDCap-based survey was built and made available on a LCPD study group website. The survey included childhood and adult LCPD history, SF-36 Health Survey, and the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS). Statistical analysis included t-test and linear and proportional odds regressions. Of the 1182 participants who completed the survey, 261 participants (89 M, 172 F) had a THR. The mean age at survey was 44.6±12.4 years (range 20–79). The mean duration since THR was 7.2±8 years (median 4, range 0–43). Gender and age matched analysis showed that THR participants had significantly lower HOOS Quality-of-Life and Sports scores (p<0.0001) for all age groups in comparison to a normative cohort. In women, the HOOS Symptoms, Daily Living, and Pain scores were also significantly lower in the <55 age groups (p<0.05). Similarly, SF-36 scores were significantly lower (p<0.05) in female <45 age groups in 5 out of 8 SF-36 scales. Overall, hip dysplasia and the number of years-from-THR were the main factors associated with worse SF-36 and HOOS scores. In comparison to the non-THR participants, THR participants had higher scores in some of the HOOS and SF-36 scales. LCPD participants with THR had significantly worse HOOS and SF-36 scores in most of the scales studied than a normative cohort, especially in women. There is significant disability even after a THR, warranting continued efforts to improve treatment and outcome.
A variety of radiological methods of measuring
version of the acetabular component after total hip replacement (THR)
have been described. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability
and validity of six methods (those of Lewinnek; Widmer; Hassan et
al; Ackland, Bourne and Uhthoff; Liaw et al; and Woo and Morrey)
that are currently in use. In 36 consecutive patients who underwent
THR, version of the acetabular component was measured by three independent
examiners on plain radiographs using these six methods and compared
with measurements using CT scans. The intra- and interobserver reliabilities
of each measurement were estimated. All measurements on both radiographs
and CT scans had excellent intra- and interobserver reliability
and the results from each of the six methods correlated well with
the CT measurements. However, measurements made using the methods
of Widmer and of Ackland, Bourne and Uhthoff were significantly
different from the CT measurements (both p <
0.001), whereas
measurements made using the remaining four methods were similar
to the CT measurements. With regard to reliability and convergent
validity, we recommend the use of the methods described by Lewinnek,
Hassan et al, Liaw et al and Woo and Morrey for measurement of version
of the acetabular component.
It has been suggested that transient osteoporosis or the bone marrow oedema syndrome (BMOS) may be the initial phase of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) and that there may be a common pathophysiology. In this study, we have assessed the MR images of 200 consecutive patients with ONFH in respect of the BMO pattern in order to test this hypothesis. This pattern was not observed in the early stage of ONFH. The initial abnormal finding detected on the MR images was an abnormal band of intensity at the junction between the necrotic area and the normal bone. Structural damage of the head seems to result in the appearance of the BMO pattern and the development of pain in ONFH. There was no finding to support the existence of a continuum between BMOS and ONFH.
The extent of necrosis is the main determining factor in the outcome of osteonecrosis of the femoral head and is best measured by MRI. Using statistical analyses, we have evaluated the accuracy and repeatability of seven different methods of measuring the extent of necrosis, of which three demonstrate good or acceptable accuracy. For the general observer their repeatability is poor; only for experienced observers were they reasonable. We conclude that within an institution or for personal use, the accuracy of some methods is acceptable, and repeatability reasonable. None is appropriate for international use.