Stem malalignment in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been associated with poor long-term outcomes and increased complications (e.g. periprosthetic femoral fractures). Our understanding of the biomechanical impact of stem alignment in cemented and uncemented THA is still limited. This study aimed to investigate the effect of stem fixation method, stem positioning, and compromised bone stock in THA. Validated FE models of cemented (C-stem – stainless steel) and uncemented (Corail – titanium) THA were developed to match corresponding experimental model datasets; concordance correlation agreement of 0.78 & 0.88 for cemented & uncemented respectively. Comparison of the aforementioned stems was carried out reflecting decisions made in the current clinical practice. FE models of the implant positioned in varus, valgus, and neutral alignment were then developed and altered to represent five different bone defects according to the Paprosky classification (Type I – Type IIIb). Strain was measured on the femur at 0mm (B1), 40mm (B2), and 80mm (B3) from the lesser trochanter.Abstract
Objectives
Methods
Aim of this prospective, randomized study is to introduce and compare a new technique of reduction of the anterior dislocation of the shoulder with the “Hippocrates” and “Kocher” methods, as far as its efficacy, safety and intensity of the pain felt by the patient during the reduction, are concerned. This is the first reported prospective, randomized comparative study of three reduction techniques of anterior dislocations of the shoulder. 154 patients suffering from acute anterior shoulder dislocation participated in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to one of the three study groups (New, “Hippocrates” and “Kocher”) and underwent reduction of their dislocation performed by residents orthopaedic surgeons. The groups were statistically comparable (age, male/ female ratio, mechanism of dislocation, mean time interval between injury and first attempt of reduction). Reduction was achieved with the “Fares” method in 88.6%, with the “Hippocrates” in 72.5% and with the “Kocher” in 68% of the patients. This difference was statistically significant, favoring the new method (p=0.033). The mean duration of the reduction (p=0.000) and the mean reported by the patients VAS with the new method (p=0.000) were also statistically significantly lower than those of the other methods. No complications were noted in any group. The new method seems to be more effective, faster and less painful method of reduction of the anterior shoulder dislocation, when compared with the “Hippocrates” and the “Kocher” methods. It is easily performed by only one physician and it is not more morbid that the other two methods.
Aggrecan is a major constituent of joint cartilage. A prominent feature in joint disease is loss of Aggrecan. The aim of this study was to assess the relation between the concentration of Aggrecan in the synovial fluid of knee joint and this of the peripheral blood in patients suffering from end stage knee osteoarthritis 37 postmenopausal women suffering from end-stage idiopathic knee osteoarthritis, scheduled to undergo Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), were enrolled in this study. Their mean age was 69.8 years (range: 49–81 years). The serum levels of Aggrecan were evaluated one day pre-operatively whether synovial fluid levels from fluid taken during the operation day. Patients suffering from any endocrine disorder, rheumatoid or other secondary arthritis or any other disease that could interfere with the cartilage homeostasis were excluded from the study. Concentrations of aggrecan turnover were measured with appropriate assays. Moderate correlation between serum and synovial fluid concentrations of aggrecan was revealed (r= 0, 337, p=0,197) Serum levels of aggrecan may be related to the synovial concentration of Aggrecan in patients suffering from end stage knee osteoarthritis. The possible significant relationship between these markers may be of value in assessing cartilage degradation in patients with involvement of a single joint with a blood sample. However this correlation needs to be further investigated
The aim of this study was to extend the evaluation of the course of bone turnover markers over a longer period (12 postoperative months) following a TJA, and to assess the postoperative course for two of them (RANKL and Osteoprotegerin) for the first time.
The adolescents were divided in two groups. In the first group (n=47) were included adolescents wearing the brace for over two years (mean time of application 3, 3 years) and the second group (n=44) included adolescents, which have been treated with Boston brace for less than two years (mean time of application 1, 2 years). Every child completed a detailed questionnaire (SRS-22) concerning the evaluation of function, pain, self image, mental health and satisfaction with management. Both groups were comparable according to age and degrees of scoliotic curve.
Patients were divided into two groups according to the type of hip fracture. Group 1 included 299 patients with subcapital fractures, 61 men and 238 women and the second group 353 patients with intertrochanteric fractures, 98 men and 298 women. Patients’ demographics concerning age, sex, weight, height on admission at the hospital were compared between groups.
Patients were divided into two groups according to the injected drug. Group 1 or the injected group (n=91) received a caudal extradural injection (CEI) that consists of 12 to 15 ml of 2% xylocaine together with 1 ml of Betamethasone Dipropionate and Betamethasone phosphate. Group 2 or the placebo group (n=52), received a caudal extradural injection that consists of 6–8 ml of 2% xylocaine mixed with 6–8 ml of water for injection. The mean duration of symptoms was comparable between the two groups. In order to estimate the degree of recovery from symptoms, all patients answered a specific questionnaire. The Oswestry Disability Index Questionnaire (ODI) was answered by all patients on the first day of clinical examination, and on different follow-up periods after caudal injection. The straight leg-raising test was evaluated in all patients at the same follow – up periods.