header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXIX | Pages 40 - 40
1 Jul 2012
Arthur C Keenan A Clayton R Brenkel I Walmsley P
Full Access

This study reports the first 10-year clinical and radiological follow-up data for the Sigma PFC. The DuPuy Sigma total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a modification of the well established Press Fit Condylar (PFC) TKA and is used extensively in the UK and worldwide. It is the most commonly used TKA in England and Wales, where it accounts for 34% of all primary TKA.

A total of 235 consecutive Sigma TKAs were performed in 203 patients between October 1998 and October 1999, in our unit. Patients were seen at a specialist nurse led clinic 7 to 10 days before admission and at 6 months, 18 months, 3 years, 5 years and 7-10 years after surgery. Data was recorded prospectively at each clinic visit. Radiographs were obtained at the 5 year and 8-10 year follow-up appointment.

Of 235 knees 171 (147 patients) were alive at 10 years. Twelve were lost to follow up. Nine knees (3.8%) were revised; five for infection and four underwent change of polyethylene insert. Ten-year survival with and end point of revision for any reason was 95.9%, and with and endpoint of revision for aseptic failure was 98.7%. The mean American Knee Society score was 62 at 8-10 years compared with 31 out of 100 pre-operatively. Of 109 radiographs, 47 knees had radiolucent lines but none showed radiological evidence of loosening.

Our results show that the PFC Sigma knee arthroplasty performs well over the first 10 years post implantation.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXIX | Pages 108 - 108
1 Jul 2012
Keenan A Arthur C Jenkins P Wood A Walmsley P Brenkel IJ
Full Access

We set out to demonstrate the 10-year survivorship of the PFC sigma TKA in a young patient group.

Demographic and clinical outcome data were collected prospectively at 6 months, 18 months, 3 years, 5 years and 8-10 years post surgery.

The data were analysed using Kaplan Meier survival statistics with end point being regarded as death or revision for any reason.

203 patients were found to be ≤55 years at the time of surgery. Four patients required revision and four patients died. Another four patients moved away from the region and were excluded from the study.

A total of 224 knees in 199 patients (101 male and 98 females.) 168 patients had a diagnosis of Osteoarthritis and 28 with inflammatory arthritis. Average age 50.6 years range 28-55 years (median 51).

Ten-year survivorship in terms of revision 98.2% at ten years 95% confidence interval.

Our results demonstrate that the PFC Sigma knee has an excellent survival rate in young patients over the first 10 years.

TKR should not be withheld from patients on the basis of age.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXIX | Pages 109 - 109
1 Jul 2012
Keenan A Walmsley P Arthur C Wood A Jenkins P Brenkel I
Full Access

The aim of this study was to compare the long-term outcome from total knee replacement (TKR) in young versus old patients in terms of pain and functional outcome.

We used our arthroplasty database which recorded prospectively pain and American Knee Society scores at regular intervals over ten years after TKR. The procedures used a modern, cemented resurfacing type cruciate retaining prosthesis. A cohort of young patients (≤55 years) were identified. A control group of patients > 56 was identified, matching for ASA, body mass index and underlying condition. Change over time was analysed using a factorial repeated measures ANOVA test, which allowed for investigation of difference between groups.

40 Knees in 26 patients were identified. 2 patients died prior to follow up, 2 were revised within the study period. (1 for infection at 2 years and one for change of poly at 7 years) and a further 4 were lost to follow up. 7 knees could not be matched and were excluded. This left a study group of 24 young and 24 older knees.

Pain scores (p=0.025) and American Knee Society “Knee” (p<0.001) and “Function” (p<0.001) scores changed significantly over time. There were however no statistical differences over the 10 year period in pain (p=0.436) and knee performance (0.618) but overall function was higher throughout the period in the younger group (=0.004).

Knee replacement in younger patients produces similar outcomes in terms of pain and function compared with older patients and TKR should not be withheld purely on account of age.