The aims of this study were to determine the change in the sagittal alignment of the pelvis and the associated impact on acetabular component position at one-year follow-up after total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study represents the one-year follow-up of a previous short-term study at our institution. Using the patient population from our prior study, the radiological pelvic ratio was assessed in 91 patients undergoing THA, of whom 50 were available for follow-up of at least one year (median 1.5; interquartile range (IQR) 1.1 to 2.0). Anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis were obtained in the standing position preoperatively and at one year postoperatively. Pelvic ratio was defined as the ratio between the vertical distance from the inferior sacroiliac (SI) joints to the superior pubic symphysis and the horizontal distance between the inferior SI joints. Apparent acetabular component position changes were determined from the change in pelvic ratio. A change of at least 5° was considered clinically meaningful.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to determine the change in standing pelvic sagittal alignment and associated impact on functional acetabular component position at follow-up after total hip arthroplasty (THA). A retrospective review was performed on 91 consecutive patients who had undergone primary THA by a single surgeon via a posterior approach in the lateral decubitus position. Of these, 41 patients had high quality standing AP pelvis radiographs preoperatively, at six weeks postoperatively, and at one year postoperatively available for analysis. Pelvic ratio was defined as the ratio between the vertical distance from the inferior sacroiliac (SI) joints to the superior pubic symphysis and the horizontal distance between the inferior SI joints. Apparent changes in the functional acetabular component position were determined from the change in pelvic ratio between the preoperative and one year postoperative standing AP pelvic radiograph. A change of at least five degrees was considered clinically meaningful.Background
Patients and Methods
