The ideal treatment method regarding various defect sizes after local aggressive tumor resection is unknown. We investigated the biomechanical properties of metaphyseal defect filling regarding different defect sizes and fixation methods.

Ninety-one sheep tibias were divided into five groups as 21 tibias per four study groups and 7 tibias in the control group. Study groups were further divided into three subgroups according to 25%, 50% and 75% metaphyseal defect size. Control group tibias were left intact. In study group 1, a metaphyseal defect was created and no further process was applied. Metaphyseal defects were filled with cement without fixation in group 2. Cement filling and fixation with 2 screws were performed in group 3. In addition to cement filling, plate-screw fixation was performed in group 4. Axial loading test was applied to all tibias and the results were compared between study subgroups and control group.

Plate-screw fixation was found to have the best biomechanical properties in all defect sizes. Load to failure for screw fixation was found to be significantly decreased between 25% and 50% defect size (P<0.05). However, load to failure for isolated cement filling was not affected from defect size (p>0.05).

In conclusion, size of the defect predicts the fixation method in addition to filling with cement. Filling with cement in metaphyseal defects was found to be biomechanically insufficient. In addition to filling with cement, additional screw fixation in less than 25% defects and plate-screw fixation in more than 25% defects may decrease tibial plateau fracture or metaphyseal fracture risk after local aggressive tumor resection.