Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 102-B, Issue SUPP_2 | Pages 66 - 66
1 Feb 2020
Sato A Kanazawa T Koya T Okumo T Kato S Kawashima F Tochio H Hoshino Y Tomita K Takagi H
Full Access

Introduction

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most successful surgeries to relieve pain and dysfunction caused by severe arthritis. However, it is a still big problem that there is a possibility of death in pulmonary embolism (PE) after TKA. We previously reported that there was more incidence of asymptomatic PE than estimated in general by detail examinations. But it was difficult to whom we decided to perform additional examinations except the patients with some doubtful symptoms. Therefore, we investigated detail of PE patients after primary TKA to find out anything key point in PE.

Methods

Consecutive ninety-nine patients who underwent primary TKA from January 2015 to March 2018 were applied. There were 23 male and 76 females included, and the mean age was 73.7 years old. There were 96 cases of osteoarthritis, 2 cases of osteonecrosis and one of rheumatoid arthritis. A single knee surgery team performed all operations with cemented type prostheses and air tourniquet during operation. There were 35 cases of one-staged bilateral TKA and 64 of unilateral TKA. Detail examinations with contrast enhanced CT (CE-CT) and venous ultrasonography (US) were performed at the 3rd day after surgery. Next, we applied ultra sound cardiogram (UCG) to the patients diagnosed as PE by CE-CT, we checked right ventricular overload (RVO) to treat PE. These images were read by a single senior radiologist team.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_8 | Pages 24 - 24
1 May 2016
Hamada D Wada K Goto T Tsutsui T Kato S Sairyo K
Full Access

Background

Continuous epidural anesthesia or femoral nerve block has decreased postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty to some extent. Although the established efficacy of these pain relief method, some adverse events such as hematoma or muscle weakness are still problematic. Intraoperative local infiltration of analgesia (LIA) has accepted as a promising pain control method after total knee arthroplasty. The safety and efficacy of LIA has been reported, although there are still limited evidence about the effect of LIA on quadriceps function and recovery of range of motion in early post-operative phase. The purpose of this study is to compare the quadriceps function and range of motion after TKA between the LIA with continuous epidural anesthesia and continuous epidural anesthesia alone.

Methods

Thirty patients with knee osteoarthritis who underwent primary TKA were included in this study. Patients who took anticoagulants were treated continuous epidural anesthesia alone (n=11) and the other patients were treated with LIA with continuous epidural anesthesia (n=19). A single surgeon at our department performed all surgeries. Surgical procedure and rehabilitation process was identical between two groups. Before the implantation, analgesic drugs consisting of 20 ml of 0.75 % ropivacaine and 6.6 mg of dexamethasone were injected into the peri-articular tissues. In each group, fentanyl continuous epidural patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was also used during 48-h post-operative period. Knee flexion and extension angle were evaluated before surgery, post-op day 3, 7, 10 and 14. The quadriceps function was evaluated by quadriceps peak torque at 30° and 60° flexion using VIODEX. The peak torque was recorded preoperatively, day 14 and 3 month after surgery. The difference between two groups was analyzed by Mann Whitney U-test using Prism 6, a statistical software.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_34 | Pages 385 - 385
1 Dec 2013
Kuroyanagi Y Yoshida H Fujimaki R Kato S Inaba N
Full Access

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) provides good results even for severe knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients. However, patients often suffer from post-operative pain and have long rehabilitation periods. In recent years, utilization of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has increased in an effort to decrease pain and shorten recovery compared to TKA. Moreover, the long-term results of the UKA have improved. Many surgeons now wonder whether TKA or UKA is better for patients with isolated medial knee OA. In Japan, the government has public insurance system and patients are able to receive the joint replacement surgery inexpensively. This study was conducted to compare the cost the public insurance and the patients co-payment for TKA and UKA.

We investigated a series of thirty TKAs and fifteen UKAs performed in Fussa Hospital (Tokyo, Japan) from July 2012 to April 2013. Data from two TKAs' were excluded since the patients had comorbidities (asthma and severe DM) that extended their hospitalizations. Patients were discharged from the hospital if they were able to go up and down the stairs or were able to conduct routine activities of daily living.

Total payments the hospital received averaged $19600 (S.D. $1600) for a TKA and $15200 (S.D. $1300) for a UKA. Patients paied averaged of $690 (S.D. $370) for a TKA and $470 (S.D. $170) for a UKA (Figure 1). The surgical fee was $3769 for both TKA and UKA, and was uniform thoughout Japan. The implant price averaged $6200 (S.D. $300) for TKA and $3900 (S.D. $200) for UKA, where prices were also determined by the government. Hospitalization averaged 28 days (S.D. 7 days) for TKA and 21 days (S.D. 6 days) for UKA. For both TKA and UKA, the total cost and the number of days in hospital were highly correlated (R = 0.92 and R = 0.96, respectively). A linear cost model suggests the TKA cost was $210 times days of hospitalization plus $13100 and the UKA cost was $220 times days of hospitalization plus $10000. Patients' payments were not correlated to the days of hospitalization (R = 0.22 and R = 0.45, respectively).

TKA and UKA are performed all over the world now and the number of the surgeries increases each year. Althouth each country has a different insurance system, many countries face an increasing and problematic economic burden for both patients and insurance organization (either public or private company). This study showed UKA is less expensive than TKA by $4400, an advantage that might complement the traditional view that UKA is less invasive and often has fewer complications for treating isolating medical compartment OA. For Japanese system, patients pay relatively little out-of pocket despite long hospitalization, and length of stay has a direct and significant effect on total cost for TKA and UKA