The femur is a common site for skeletal bony metastases. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of femoral intramedullary nailing in prophylactic versus therapeutic treatment in femoral metastases.

All femoral nails between April 2011 and November 2015 at a district general hospital were assessed. Intramedullary nailing performed for prophylactic or therapeutic management were included. Outcomes include mortality, survival time and length of stay in hospital.

A total of 40 cases were included. In the prophylactic group there were 25 patients and in the therapeutic group there were 15 patients. In the prophylactic group, mean age was 70 years (range 41–91); male to female ratio is 23:17 and 26 patients of this group was deceased. In the therapeutic group, mean age was 76 years (range 56–92); male to female ratio 15:10 and 10 patients were deceased in this group. The most common primary was prostate carcinoma followed by breast carcinoma. In the prophylactic group, mean survival was 25 weeks (range 2–147) and in the therapeutic group mean survival was 20 weeks (range 2–39). The length of stay was 21 days (range 3–80) in the prophylactic group and 28 days (range 7–63) in the therapeutic group.

Femoral nailing for metastases helps improve quality of life and we observed a mean survival time of 20–25 weeks postoperatively in both therapeutic and prophylactic nailing.

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an antifibrinolytic that can prevent clot breakdown. Trauma patients often have coagulopathy which can cause mortality due to bleeding. The purpose of this review is to investigate the efficacy of TXA in reducing mortality in major trauma and secondly to look at patient's outcomes when using TXA in trauma.

Searches were performed in PUBMED, EMBASE and other databases for randomised controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies. The author searched for all relevant evidence on the use of TXA in major trauma. Relevant studies were assessed for quality using the Cochrane's Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias.

Eight relevant studies were identified from the search, 3 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 5 observational studies were identified. Five of the 8 studies found a significance in mortality with TXA use. Three showed TXA reduced mortality including the high quality level I evidence, CRASH 2 study. Three studies found no significance on mortality. There appears to be no increased risk of VOE with TXA however results from the studies varied. No study reported any adverse events due to TXA use. There does not appear to be any significant benefit of TXA use in TBI but a trend towards lower mortality. There is a role in paediatric trauma despite evidence from only 2 observational studies.

There is a high quality RCT to suggest the use of TXA in trauma patients with supporting evidence from observational studies. The outcomes in TBI are unclear. It may be beneficial in paediatric use but there is currently no level 1 evidence in paediatrics to support this. Further prospective studies looking specifically at role in TBI and paediatric trauma are required to support routine use in these specific populations.