This study of surgically treated distal tibia fractures was undertaken to compare the internal fixation with the two external fixation methods. There were 40 patients with 41 pilon fractures. The mean age was 51.2 years (18–76). 17 of the 40 patients-14 from vehicular accident, 3 from fall – were treated with an ankle-spanning half-pin external fixator (11C, 6B, 11 Weber B- 5 C, 1IIIa, 5I, 6II). 11 patients-10 from vehicular accident, 1 from fall- were treated with a single-ring hybrid ankle-spanning external fixator (9C, 2 B, 6 Weber B-4 C, 5I, 2II). 13 patients-10 from vehicular accident and 1 from fall- were treated with an epiunion plate (1A, 8B, 4C, 5I, 3II, 10 Weber B- 1C). The mean follow-up was 4.2years (1–8). Fracture union was defined as having three cortices bridging on the plain radiographs for a patient who was able to bear full weight. Non union was defined as a fracture that did not heal within a year. Fracture union was achieved for 36 of the 41 fractures. Three patients with external fixator, one with hybrid and one with plate had septic pseudarthrosis. Fractures in the external fixator and hybrid groups had a tendency to lose the reduction. Four patients with external fixator had delayed union and have lost range of motion in the ankle. Five patients in the external fixator group are candidates for ankle arthrodesis due to arthritis. The ORIF and hybrid fixator were equally efficacious in achieving bony union and not to lose range of motion in the ankle. Fractures in the external fixator with the ankle – spanning had higher rate of delayed union and loss of motion in ankle. The choice of the external fixator is dependent on the surgeon and the type of the fracture. However the patient must be followed up for the stability of the system.
This study describes the clinical features and treatment of the 53 patients with primary tumors of the hand. A review of primary tumors of the small bones of the hand during a 9 year period (1991–2001) was done. There were 14 enchondromas, 1 malignant fibrous histiocytoma, 15 ganglions, 5 haemangiomas, 1 haemangioma of median nerve, 4 giant cell tumors of tendon sheath, 4 osteoid osteomas, 1 lymphangioma, 1 exostosis, 1 dermatofibrosarcoma, 1 neurilemoma, 2 neurinomas, 1 glomus tumor, 1 benign fibrous histiocytomas and 1 papillary endothelial hyperplasia. There were 34 males and 19 females with an average age 37.7 years. The mean follow-up was 6y (1–8y). There were 33 lesions in the fingers, 3 in the metacarpals, 13 in the carpus and 4 in the palm. Swelling and localized tenderness were the most common presenting complaints. One patient died of metastatic disease. 3 patients were seen initially with locally reccurent lesion. All the patients were treated surgically. The material was analyzed in terms of diagnosis, localization, surgical management and post-operative complications. Primary tumors of the hand are rare. The cases in these series are similar to that of other reports. As in other musculoskeletal neoplasms, a treatment plan must be formulated based on the location, size and biologic behaviour of the lesion.