Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating diagnosis that carries a significant rate of associated mortality and places a large burden on health care systems. Treatment protocols often include combined intravenous antibiotics and staged revision surgery with locally-delivered antibiotics via PMMA cement spacers and/or beads. One disadvantage of PMMA is the need for later removal. Antibiotic releasing Calcium Sulphate beads (CaSO4) have had promising results in revision joint surgery and are absorbable, making later removal unnecessary. We report on use in a tertiary referral centre in the UK and present our initial findings. CaSO4 beads containing 1 gram of Vancomycin and 240 mg of tobramycin per 10 cc was implanted in 12 patients between August 2012 and December 2012, all having undergone revision joint surgery for PJI. Of these patients; 7 were men and 5 women, mean age was 57 years (range 39–72) with a mean ASA grade of 2 (1–4). Indications were infected Total Hip Replacement (n = 7), infected Total Knee Replacement (n = 4) and infected metal on metal hip resurfacing (n = 1). Three procedures were emergencies, with the remainder being semi-elective procedures. One patient had single-stage revision THR. At latest follow up 10 patients had made a full recovery, with normal function and inflammatory markers. Two patients were awaiting a second stage revision procedure. Mean follow up was 2 months (1–4).Introduction:
Methods & Results:
Revision surgery for total knee replacement is a complex procedure, carrying an increased risk for the patient and cost for hospitals. As well as increased cost of peri-operative investigations, blood transfusions, surgical instrumentation, implants and theatre time, there is a well documented increased length of stay (LOS), accounting for the majority of actual costs associated with surgery. We compared revision surgery for infection vs. other causes (aseptic loosening, dislocation, mal-alignment). Clinical, demographic and economic data were obtained for 180 consecutive revision total knee replacements performed at a tertiary referral centre between 2003 and 2012. Actual costs and National Health Service tariffs were compared per patient and mean difference calculated. Mean age was 66 years (range 17–87) with 62 male and 117 female patients. Mean LOS for aseptic cases was 10 days (range 1–62) and 20 days (range 4–103) for infection. Mean cost difference in aseptic cases (n = 125) was £−933 (SD = £12,204), and £−3907 (SD = £7,256) for infection (n = 54). Surgery for infection was associated with increased operating times, blood loss and complications compared to revision for aseptic causes. LOS for infection was on average double that for aseptic cases (p < 0.05). Current NHS tariffs do not fully reimburse the increased costs associated with providing a revision knee surgery service, with even greater cost incurred by the treating hospital for infected cases. These losses may negatively influence the provision of revision surgery in the NHS.
