We describe results of a new ‘two needle technique’ of selective nerve root blocks done through posterior triangle of neck in the management of cervical radiculopathy with 2 year results.
Proximal humeral fractures are common injuries but there is no general agreement on the best method for fixing unstable and displaced 3 &
4 part fractures. A new implant – Proximal Humeral Internal Locking System (PHILOS) – has recently been introduced to fix these fractures. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the PHILOS plate in the surgical treatment of these fractures. We operated upon 36 patients between March 2002 and December 2004. 33 of them were available for follow up, which ranged from 12–45 months. Assessment at follow up included radiological review, Constant and DASH scoring. While recovery of movements and relief in pain was satisfactory, the strength of shoulder did not recover fully in any patient. There were two failures in our series, one due to breakage of plate. 4 patients have shown radiological signs of avascular necrosis of humeral head. The plate was removed in 4 patients due to impingement and / or mechanical block in abduction. Another 2 patients had to undergo arthroscopic subacromial decompression for the same reasons. We encountered the problem of cold welding and distortion of screw heads, while removing the PHILOS plate. The broken plate was subjected to biomechanical and metallurgical analysis, which revealed that the plate is inherently weak at the site of failure. The PHILOS plate does have inherent advantages over other implants for fixation of 3 and 4 part proximal humeral fractures but we are not convinced about its strength. Design of its proximal screws also appears less than satisfactory. The plate may cause impingement in some patients necessitating its removal later on, which itself may not be easy.
Proximal humeral non-unions are uncommon, but when they occur they are disabling and often present a surgical challenge. We have treated 55 cases of proximal humeral fractures by internal fixation from March 2002 to March 2004. Of these, 18 were non-unions out of which 16 were treated using AO Cannulated blade plate and bone grafting. Results of these patients are presented in this report. 14 out of 16 were available for follow up, which ranged from 18–30 months. Patients were regularly reviewed clinically and radiologically and had constant and DASH scoring at final follow up. Average Constant score was 64 and DASH score was 35.3. Range of movement recovered to 50% or more in every patient but only 3 had full range of movements. Maximum recovery in the strength of shoulder muscles measured with myometer was about 75% as compared to other side. Although X-rays showed sound bony healing in all but one case, none of the patients was completely symptom free at final review. However, they were all satisfied with the outcome of their operation. Stable internal fixation is the key to success of surgical treatment of non-unions. We are satisfied with the usefulness of AO cannulated blade plate in providing a rigid fixation in our cases. However, it is difficult to achieve perfect results in terms of pain relief and recovery of normal function due to various reasons, which would be highlighted in our presentation. The report would also discuss the technical difficulties encountered in using this implant.
Aim: To highlight the hitherto undescribed arch patterns of Lisfranc injuries. Methodology: 8 patients with atypical Lisfranc injuries were studied prospectively. Arch patterns: In 2 patients the arch started at the medial aspect of the ankle with injury to the medial malleolus or the deltoid ligament, passed through the tarsometatarsal region and ended at the cuboid. In one patient the arch started at the tarsometatarsal joints and ended at the lateral malleolus and in another patient the lateral end point resulted in tear of the calcaneofibular ligament. One patient had the medial starting point at the Lisfranc ligament but the arch of injuries went through the forefoot fracturing the midshaft of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th metatarsal shafts without injuring the tarsometatarsal region, thus forming an arch pattern much more distal than usual. Six of the 8 patients had operative management. On follow up, in terms of activities of daily living, 75% had excellent function of the foot. It is not the aim of this paper to highlight the management of these injuries. Conclusion: In the process of listing the telltale signs of a Lisfranc injury it is mandatory to bear in mind that the arch of injuries may extend to as proximal as the ankle joint or as distal as the forefoot and this will enable us to define the entire spectrum of the Lisfranc injury, however atypical it may be.
Suture anchors have changed the practice of repair of tendons in modern Orthopaedics. The purpose of the study was to identify the ideal suture anchor length for anchoring flexor digitorum profundus tendon to the distal phalanx. We dissected 395 distal phalanges from 80 embalmed hands. Phalanges from two little fingers and three thumbs were damaged, hence were excluded from the study. We measured the Anteroposterior and Lateral dimensions at three fixed points on the distal phalanges of all 395 fingers using a Vernier’s Callipers with 0.1mm accuracy. The mean value of the Anteroposterior width of the distal phalanx at the insertion of the FDP was found to be 3.4mm for the little finger; 3.9mm for the ring finger; 4.3mm for the middle finger; 4.0mm for the index finger and 5.0mm for the thumb respectively. The commonly available anchors and drill bits were found to be too long when used for anchoring the flexor digitorum profundus tendon in certain distal phalanges. Our findings may be a reason for poor outcome of FDP repair to distal phalanx using suture anchors. New designs for tissue anchors for distal phalanges may be necessary.
Disorders of the pisotriquetral joint can cause ulnar sided wrist pain. This joint is not usually seen during routine wrist arthrosopy because it often has a separate joint cavity. The senior author believes that it is more commonly seen from the 6R portal if looked for, than one would expect from the assumed anatomy. This study assessed the frequency with which the pisotriquetral joint could be observed in 36 consecutive wrist arthroscopies. The connection between the radiocarpal and the pisotriquetral joint were found to vary from a complete membrane separating the two, to no membrane at all, with variations in between. The types of connections are described. The anatomy of the connections was also studied by dissecting the wrist joints of eight fresh frozen cadavers. The findings matched the arthroscopic observations. In more than 50% of patients, the pisotriquetral joint could be clearly visualised by arthroscopy. The technique and findings have been recorded on video and form part of the presentation.