As the demand for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been on the rise, so will be the demand for revision knee surgery. Nevertheless, our knowledge on the modes of failure and factors associated with failure of knee revision surgery is considerably lower to that known for primary TKA. To date, this has been mostly based on case series within the literature. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the survivorship of revision TKA and determine the reasons of failure. A retrospective study was conducted with prior approval of the institutional audit department. This involved evaluation of existing clinical records and radiographs of patients who underwent revision knee surgery at our institution between 2003 and 2015. Re-revision was identified as the third or further procedure on the knee in which at least one prosthetic component was inserted or changed.Introduction
Methods
We reviewed renal function of 22 patients who had undergone total knee replacements using the enhanced recovery protocol (Caledonian technique) between August 2012 and November 2012 at a district general hospital in the west of Scotland. Pre-operative and post operative data were compared to determine if there was any change. We observed that 4 out of 22 (18%) of patients had a significant rise in creatinine, and 6 out of 22 (27%) had an abnormal eGFR. These findings were significant and were classed as (Acute Kidney Injury) AKI type 1, which should be treated actively. Subsequently, we collected data in the same way for 22 patients who underwent total knee replacements without using the enhanced recovery protocol. In this group, only one (5%) had a significant rise in creatinine and 2 (9%) had an abnormal eGFR. Significant difference is noted in the two groups. We conclude that the enhanced recovery protocol has some adverse effect on a patient's renal function. Our hypothesis is that this is due to restriction of fluids after surgery but a larger study is needed to find the cause and ways to avoid this.
