The burden of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been rising in line with the number of primary operations performed. Current estimates suggest an infection rate of 1–2.4%. Two-stage revision has traditionally been considered the gold standard of treatment; however, some studies suggest comparable results can be achieved with single-stage procedures. The potential advantages include less time in hospital, a single anaesthetic, reduced costs, and greater patient satisfaction. We reviewed data for 72 patients (47 males, 25 females), with a mean age of 71 years (range, 49 to 94), who underwent single-stage revision TKA for confirmed PJI between 2006 and 2016. A standardized debridement protocol was performed with immediate single-stage exchange. All cases were discussed preoperatively at multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings, which included input from a senior musculoskeletal microbiologist. Patients were not excluded for previous revisions, culture-negative PJI, or the presence of a sinus.Introduction
Methods
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Two-stage revision has traditionally been considered the gold standard of treatment for established infection, but increasing evidence is emerging in support of one-stage exchange for selected patients. The objective of this study was to determine the outcomes of single-stage revision TKA for PJI, with mid-term follow-up. A total of 84 patients, with a mean age of 68 years (36 to 92), underwent single-stage revision TKA for confirmed PJI at a single institution between 2006 and 2016. In all, 37 patients (44%) were treated for an infected primary TKA, while the majority presented with infected revisions: 31 had undergone one previous revision (36.9%) and 16 had multiple prior revisions (19.1%). Contraindications to single-stage exchange included systemic sepsis, extensive bone or soft-tissue loss, extensor mechanism failure, or if primary wound closure was unlikely to be achievable. Patients were not excluded for culture-negative PJI or the presence of a sinus.Aims
Methods
As the demand for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been on the rise, so will be the demand for revision knee surgery. Nevertheless, our knowledge on the modes of failure and factors associated with failure of knee revision surgery is considerably lower to that known for primary TKA. To date, this has been mostly based on case series within the literature. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the survivorship of revision TKA and determine the reasons of failure. A retrospective study was conducted with prior approval of the institutional audit department. This involved evaluation of existing clinical records and radiographs of patients who underwent revision knee surgery at our institution between 2003 and 2015. Re-revision was identified as the third or further procedure on the knee in which at least one prosthetic component was inserted or changed.Introduction
Methods
We reviewed renal function of 22 patients who had undergone total knee replacements using the enhanced recovery protocol (Caledonian technique) between August 2012 and November 2012 at a district general hospital in the west of Scotland. Pre-operative and post operative data were compared to determine if there was any change. We observed that 4 out of 22 (18%) of patients had a significant rise in creatinine, and 6 out of 22 (27%) had an abnormal eGFR. These findings were significant and were classed as (Acute Kidney Injury) AKI type 1, which should be treated actively. Subsequently, we collected data in the same way for 22 patients who underwent total knee replacements without using the enhanced recovery protocol. In this group, only one (5%) had a significant rise in creatinine and 2 (9%) had an abnormal eGFR. Significant difference is noted in the two groups. We conclude that the enhanced recovery protocol has some adverse effect on a patient's renal function. Our hypothesis is that this is due to restriction of fluids after surgery but a larger study is needed to find the cause and ways to avoid this.
Primary lymphomas of bone are uncommon malignancies with involvement of spine, long bones, pelvis, ribs and skull in decreasing order of frequency. We describe an unusual case who presented with recurrent knee effusions turned out to be a high grade B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. A 34-year-old man is presented with painful recurrent knee effusions without any systemic aberration. Multiple aspirations were carried out to help knee pain and swelling with immediate response, but had negative cytology. Hematological and biochemical parameters were normal. Plain radiographic examination of the knee failed to show any bony abnormalities. An MRI scan of the knee showed extensive marrow oedema of the distal femur with breach in the anterior cortex. Subsequently, open biopsy of the lesion was carried out which confirmed the diagnosis of a high grade B-cell Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Staging CT-scan of the chest, abdomen and pelvis failed to show any other lesions elsewhere. He was subsequently treated with the help of multi-drug chemotherapy and radiotherapy. At 7 months post treatment, the patient had no relapse and a repeat MRI at 7 months showed reduction in the size of lesion. This case illustrates the limitations of plain radiograph and the usefulness of MRI in the diagnosis of bony lymphoma. The diagnostic dilemmas while investigating recurrent knee effusions due to primary skeletal Non Hodgkin lymphoma should be resolved by timely MRI scan and histological diagnosis.
