header advert
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results per page:
Applied filters
Spine

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_6 | Pages 7 - 7
1 Feb 2016
Critchley J Prempeh M Jia W Daniell H Crawford R
Full Access

Purpose:

To produce objective evidence that lifting is more comfortable in lumbar flexion than lumbar extension.

Traditionally, lifting is taught in lumbar extension (“straight back”) but in our experience is more comfortable and stronger in flexion with backward lumbar tilt.

Method and results:

58 subjects performed maximal comfortable static lifts:

‘Natural’ lifting position - hip flexion, knee extension, lumbar extension

Traditionally taught position - hip flexion, knee flexion, lumbar extension

Backward pelvic tilt - hip flexion, knee flexion, lumbar flexion

The order of these lifting methods varied to allow for variation due to fatigue/recruitment. All lifts were measured with a computerised dynamometer.

The mean force for natural lifting was 13.4 kgs, for traditionally taught lifting 15.1 kgs and for backward pelvic tilt lifting 22.2 kgs

This represented a 13% greater load for traditionally taught lift compared with natural lift, 66% greater for backward pelvic tilt compared with natural lift and 48% greater for backward pelvic tilt compared with traditionally taught lift.