The transtibial approach is widely used for femoral tunnel positioning in ACL reconstruction. Controversy exists over the superiority of this approach over others. Few studies reflected on the reproducibility rates of the femoral tunnel position in relation to the approach used. We reviewed AP and Lat X-ray radiographs post isolated ACL reconstruction for 180 patients for femoral tunnel position, tibial tunnel position and graft inclination angle. All patients had their operations performed by one surgeon in one hospital between March 2006 and Sep 2010. All operations were performed using one standard technique using transtibial approach for femoral tunnel positioning. Two orthopaedic fellows, with similar experiences, reviewed blinded radiographs. A second reading was done 8 weeks later. Pearson inter-observer, intra-observer correlation and Bland-Altman agreements plots statistical analyses were done. Mean age was 29 years (range 16–54), Pearson intra-observer correlation shows substantial to perfect agreement while Pearson's inter-observer correlation shows moderate to substantial agreement. Previous literature proved that optimal femoral tunnel position for the best clinical and biomechanical outcome is for the centre of the tunnel to be at 43% from the lateral end of the width of the femoral condyles on the AP view and at 86% from the anterior end of the Blumensaat's line on the lateral view. In our study 85% of the femoral tunnels were within +/− 5% of the optimal tunnel position on the AP views, and more than 70% of the femoral tunnels were within +/−5% of the optimal tunnel position on the Lateral view. Interobserver and intraobserver corelations show moderate to substantial agreement, Bland-Altman agreement plots show substantial agreements for interobserver and intraobserver measurements. These results were found to be statistically significant at 0.01 Based on our results we conclude that using one standardised transtibial technique for ACL reconstruction can result in high reproducibility rates of optimal femoral tunnel position. Further studies are needed to validate our results and to study the reproducibility rates for different approaches and techniques.
Our study aims were to establish correlations between the incidence of patellofemoral pain and clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKR), using the Duracon prosthesis without patella resurfacing. A consecutive cohort of 52 patients (71 knees) were reviewed at a special follow up clinic at a mean of 29 months. All operations were carried out by a single surgeon or under his direct supervision using a standard procedure. Patients were evaluated clinically and asked directly if they had anterior knee pain. American Knee Society Scores (AKSS) and knee alignment were assessed and patients completed SF-12 and WOMAC questionnaires. Standardised 45 degree skyline and standing lateral radiographs were taken and assessed by a single blinded observer, and patella tilt and displacement measured using Gomes’ method, and patella height measured using the Insall-Salvati ratio. Knees with patellofemoral pain underwent triple phase bone scintigraphy using Technetium 99m-MDP with vascular, blood pool and static (3 hour) imaging. Significant patellofemoral pain was identified in 8 knees (11%), in 6 patients. This group had a reduced mean AKSS compared to knees without patellofemoral pain, although 50% still had a good to excellent outcome as judged by the AKSS. Only 2 knees with patellofemoral pain had abnormal alignment (2 and 12 degrees valgus). The mean SF-12 and WOMAC scores did not differ significantly between knees with patellofemoral pain and those without. Patella tilt and displacement were a common finding in this cohort, and could be as great as 17 degrees and 30% respectively without patellofemoral dysfunction. Paradoxically the mean values for these parameters were found to be reduced in knees with patellofemoral pain. Patella height did not substantially vary between knees with patellofemoral pain and those without. Bone scintigraphy of 7 of the knees with patellofemoral pain revealed a spectrum of activity from complete normality (3 knees) to tricompartmental increase in activity (2 knees). Increased activity localised to the patellofemoral articulation was evident in 2 knees. We conclude that despite favourable overall results, the Duracon prosthesis fails to eliminate patellofemoral pain without patella resurfacing. This conflicts with excellent reported results using this anatomic prosthesis with patella resurfacing. The presence of patellofemoral pain correlates well with a poor AKKS, but the role of plain radiography and bone scintigraphy as investigative tools remains unclear.
