header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 26 - 26
1 Jan 2011
Davis B Jani B Patel A
Full Access

Printed plain radiographs have traditionally been the method of image transfer between hospitals, but the advent of digital imaging has revolutionised modern day radiology. It is now commonplace for compact discs to be used as the transport media for digital images, the theoretical advantages being ease of transport and storage, integration with PACS systems and the ability to perform image manipulation. However, in our tertiary referral centre for pelvic and acetabular trauma, we noted problems with digital image transfer using this method.

We examined the last 25 compact discs sent to our unit for functionality on 3 separate computers. Only 17/25 discs loaded on all computers, and 2 discs failed to load on any computer. 9 of the remaining 23 discs did not allow image manipulation, and 1 disc would not allow retrieval of all the contained images. 5 of the 23 discs took longer than 5 minutes to retrieve the contained images. In summary, we classed 10 of the 25 discs as acceptable. Patient transfer to our unit was not delayed, but 4 patients underwent repeat CT scans due to incomplete imaging

Digital technology has made great advances into medical imaging. Standardisation using the DICOM format for image creation has attempted to eliminate issues of compatibility, but variation in software used to produce and view images can still vary from these standards. Technical errors in the creation of discs should be eliminated at source, and it is mandatory that referring units check the functionality of discs before they are sent. In this way, the potential for delay to transfer and subsequent repeat exposure to ionising radiation can be avoided.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 23 - 23
1 Jan 2011
Patel A Jani B
Full Access

As part of the workup long length femur radiograph may be carried out pre-operatively in patients presenting with a proximal femur fracture in order to rule out distant metastasis in patients with a history of malignancy but also in some patients in whom a suspicion of possible distal abnormality is aroused by the configuration of the proximal fracture

Using our unit’s database we identified all patients (n=689) presenting with a proximal femoral fracture between Sept 2006 and August 2007 at the Norfolk and Norwich University hospital in Norwich.

Of 689 patients, 92 patients (13.2%) had long length femur radiograph performed before surgery. Indications included history of cancer (39), subtrochantric fractures (14), spontaneous fracture without any fall(2), paget s disease(1), early onset osteoporosis(1) while no clear indication was available in 35 patients. Five patients (5.5%) were found to have some abnormality. Three of the 39 patients with a history of previous cancer were found to have a distal femur metastasis. Two of the 35 patients where a clear indication was not apparent had abnormal findings: one patient had a distal femur infarction and another was found to have a distal femoral malunion. In both cases long leg films did not influence choice of implant. Of the 39 patients with a previous history of cancer, 24 had short implants (hemi-arthroplasty, intramedullary device, DHS), 14 had long implants and one patient died before the operation.

Long length femoral radiographs appear to be indicated in patients with a documented history of a cancer as it helps to decide whether to use a long or short implant. However in patients without a history of malignancy, long leg films were of no value in decision making even if the configuration of the fracture was suspicious.