header advert
Results 1 - 6 of 6
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXIX | Pages 16 - 16
1 Sep 2012
Lees D Jameson S James P Serrano-Pedraza I Partington P Muller S Meek D Reed M
Full Access

Background

Dislocation is a major complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Aetiology is multi-factorial, but increasing femoral head size may result in lower dislocation rates. The latest England and Wales National Joint Registry (NJR) annual report has highlighted a statistically significant increase in the use of femoral heads of size 36mm+ from 5% in 2005 to 26% in 2009, together with an increase in the use of the posterior approach. The aim of this study was to determine whether national dislocation rates have fallen over the same period.

Methods

Hospital episode statistics (HES) data for England was analysed so as to determine trends in national rates of 3-, 6-, 12- and 18-month dislocation rates following primary THA performed between 2005 and 2009 (247,546 THAs). 18-month revision rates were also examined.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXIX | Pages 93 - 93
1 Sep 2012
Weusten A Jameson S James P Sanders R Port A Reed M
Full Access

Background

Medical complications and death are rare events following elective orthopaedic surgery. Diagnostic and operative codes are routinely collected on every patient admitted to English NHS hospitals. This is the first study investigating rates of these events following total joint replacement (TJR) on a national scale.

Methods

All patients (585177 patients) who underwent TJR (hip arthroplasty [THR], knee arthroplasty [TKR], or hip resurfacing) between 2005 and 2010 were identified. Patients were subdivided based on Charlson co-morbidity score. Data was extracted on 30-day complication rates for myocardial infarction (MI), cerebrovascular event (CVA), chest infection (LRTI), renal failure (RF), pulmonary embolus (PE) and inpatient 90-day mortality (MR).


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXIX | Pages 198 - 198
1 Sep 2012
Rymaszewska M Jameson S James P Serrano-Pedraza I Muller S Hui A Reed M
Full Access

Background

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Effectiveness recommends both low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and Rivaroxaban for venous thromboembolic (VTE) prophylaxis following lower limb arthroplasty. Despite evidence in the literature that suggests Rivaroxaban reduces VTE events, there are emerging concerns from the orthopaedic community regarding an increase in wound complications following its use.

Methods

Through the orthopaedic clinical directors forum, Trusts replacing LMWH with Rivaroxaban for lower limb arthroplasty thromboprophylaxis during 2009 were identified. Prospectively collected Hospital episode statistics (HES) data was then analysed for these units so as to determine rates of 90-day symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), major bleed (cerebrovascular accident or gastrointestinal haemorrhage), all-cause mortality, and 30-day wound infection and readmission rates before and after the change to Rivaroxaban. 2752 patients prescribed Rivaroxaban following TKR or THR were compared to 10358 patients prescribed LMWH. Data was analysed using odds ratios (OR).


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXIX | Pages 29 - 29
1 Sep 2012
Jameson S James P Rangan A Muller S Reed M
Full Access

Background

In 2011 20% of intracapsular fractured neck of femurs were treated with an uncemented hemiarthroplasty in the English NHS. National guidelines recommend cemented implants, based on evidence of less pain, better mobility and lower costs. We aimed to compare complications following cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty using the national hospital episode statistics (HES) database in England.

Methods

Dislocation, revision, return to theatre and medical complications were extracted for all patients with NOF fracture who underwent either cemented or uncemented hemiarthroplasty between January 2005 and December 2008. To make a ‘like for like’ comparison all 30424 patients with an uncemented impant were matched to 30424 cemented implants (from a total of 42838) in terms of age, sex and Charlson co-morbidity score.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXIX | Pages 122 - 122
1 Sep 2012
Ahmad S Jameson S James P Reed M McVie J Rangan A
Full Access

Background

A recent Cochrane review has shown that total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) seems to offer an advantage in terms of shoulder function over hemiarthroplasty, with no other obvious clinical benefits. This is the first study to compare complication rates on a national scale.

Methods

All patients (9804 patients) who underwent either TSA or shoulder hemiarthroplasty as a planned procedure between 2005 and 2008 in the English NHS were identified using the hospital episodes statistic database. Data was extracted on 30-day rates of readmission, wound complications, reoperation and medical complications (myocardial infarction (MI) and chest infection (LRTI)), and inpatient 90-day DVT, PE and mortality rates (MR). Revision rate at 18 months was analysed for the whole cohort and, for a subset of 939 patients, 5-year revision rate. Odds ratio (OR) was used to compare groups.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 151 - 151
1 Feb 2012
James P Blyth M May P Gerard-Tarpey W Stother I
Full Access

Aim

The aim of the study was to assess the impact of a self aligning unidirectional mobile tibial bearing and the use of a patella button on lateral patella release rates within a knee system using a common femoral component for both the fixed and mobile variants.

Methods and results

A total of 347 patients undergoing TKR were included in the study and randomly allocated to receive either a Mobile Bearing (171 knees) or a Fixed Bearing (176 knees) PS PFC Sigma TKR. Further sub-randomisation into patella resurfacing or retention was performed for both designs. The need for lateral patella release was assessed during surgery using the ‘no thumbs’ technique.

The lateral release rate was similar for fixed bearing (9.65%) and mobile bearing (9.94%) implants (p=0.963).

Patella resurfacing resulted in lower lateral release rates when compared to patella retention (5.8% vs 13.8%; p=0.0131). This difference was most marked in the mobile bearing group where the lateral release rate was 16.3% with patella retention compared to 3.5% with patella resurfacing (p=0.005).