Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 458 - 458
1 Aug 2008
Cosker T Jacobs J Ghandour A Basu K James N Chatterji S
Full Access

Purpose of study: This study assessed the current availability of “out of hours” MRI scans for patients who present with symptoms suggestive of cauda equina syndrome to trauma units across the United Kingdom (UK).

Methods: 98 trauma units in 212 hospitals across the UK were identified. Senior house officers and registrars were questioned about the availability of emergency MRI scans after 5pm and midnight and at weekends. All units responded to the survey.

Results: 88 of 98 units had an on-site MRI scanner. In 32 hospitals, an MRI scan could be obtained after 5pm. In only 27 hospitals was this possible after midnight. In 58 units (65%) of cases, consultant to consultant contact was required to arrange the scan. 67 units found it “very difficult” or “impossible” to obtain an MRI scan at the weekend producing a potential delay of 64 hours from presentation at 5pm on a Friday night to 9am on a Monday morning.

Conclusions: The availability of urgent MRI scans in cases of suspected cauda equina syndrome currently represents a “postcode lottery” across the UK. This may mean that patients requiring urgent surgical decompression face a significant delay in diagnosis. Delayed or missed cases of cauda equina syndrome have huge personal, social and economic impact. On-site MRI facilities, which are available 24 hours a day for such cases are recommended in all units receiving an acute trauma on call.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 65-B, Issue 4 | Pages 452 - 463
1 Aug 1983
Burwell R James N Johnson F Webb J Wilson Y

This paper reports a new method for expressing numerically asymmetry of the contour of the back in a forward-bending position. Information is given at three spinal levels (T8, T12 and L3) for 636 schoolchildren aged 8 to 15 years. Rib-hump and lumbar-hump scores were standardised to create trunk asymmetry scores (TASs) making comparison possible between children of different age, size and sex. Two groups of children were defined: those with clinically straight spines (585 children); and those with clinical evidence of lateral spinal curves (51 children). In the children with clinically straight spines the main findings were: about 1:4 had objectively detectable rib and lumbar humps; female-to-male ratios were 1.2:1 for the thoracic region and 1.4:1 for the lumbar region; right humps were about 10 times more common than left; TASs in the boys and girls at each spinal level had normal distributions about means to the right of zero (where zero represents perfect symmetry); at T8 and T12, a wider scatter of TASs in girls than in boys; at L3, larger TASs in girls than in boys; a relation between shortening of one lower limb and a contralateral hump on the back; and no relation to age (except at L3), stature (corrected for age) or handedness. The findings are discussed in relation to possible causes of back contour asymmetry, early diagnosis of scoliosis by screening, sexual dimorphism and significance for the pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis. Ten children with clinically straight spines and larger TASs, and 42 out of 51 children with clinical evidence of lateral spinal curves in the forward-bending position attended for radiographic examination. Twelve children had "scoliosis curves" of 11 degrees or more as defined by the Scoliosis Research Society. The results are reported in relation to TASs, spinal curve angle (Cobb) and vertebral rotation.