Early discharge after total joint arthroplasty has started to gain acceptance in select academic centers. The purpose of this study was to compare the risk of readmission of Medicare patients discharged one day after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), versus those discharged two or three days after surgery. Our hypothesis was that patients with length of stay (LOS) of one day would not have a higher risk of readmission in a community setting. A hospital impatient database was queried for all unilateral, primary total knee replacements performed on patients 65 years or older from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2014. A total of 1,117 patients discharged the day after TKA (reduced LOS) were compared with 947 patients discharged POD #2 or 3 (traditional LOS). All cases were performed at a community-based joint replacement center with rapid recovery protocols. Discharge timing and disposition were based on established functional benchmarks judged by physical therapy. The main outcome measure was all-cause 30-day readmissions. Multivariate logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratio for all cause 30-day readmission for reduced versus traditional LOS while controlling for age, gender, race, diabetes mellitus, ASA score (less than 3 versus 3 or greater), discharge disposition (home versus rehab).INTRODUCTION
METHODS
Liposomal bupivacaine has been shown to be effective in managing post-operative pain in hallux valgus and hemorrhoid surgery. However, non-industry-supported and well-powered randomized studies evaluating its efficacy in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) are lacking. Our hypothesis was that liposomal bupivacaine would not decrease post-operative visual analog pain scores (VAS) or narcotic consumption in the acute post-operative period. Two hundred seven consecutive patients were enrolled into a single-blinded prospective randomized study. We included patients undergoing unilateral TKA by five fellowship-trained surgeons with a diagnosis of osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, or post-traumatic arthritis. Patients were excluded for any other diagnosis necessitating TKA, allergy to the medications, or pre-operative opiate use. Participants received standardized pain management, anesthesia, and physical therapy. Patients were randomized intra-operatively to one of three groups: an intra-articular (IA) injection of bupivacaine and morphine at the conclusion of the procedure, a peri-articular (PA) injection of a bupivacaine and morphine, or a PA injection of liposomal bupivacaine. Post-operative pain VAS and mean morphine equivalents (MME) consumed were recorded and compared utilizing analysis of variance (ANOVA). A power analysis demonstrated that 159 patients were needed for 80% power to detect a 25% difference in VAS or MME.Introduction
Methodology
Rapid recovery protocols (RRP) for joint replacements have been shown to improve efficiency, reduce costs, and minimize adverse outcomes in academic health systems. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if RRP can be safely implemented in a community health system for total knee arthroplasty. This study used a retrospective cohort of 3,608 patients who underwent primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2014. 60 Patients were excluded because data or surgery could not be verified: BMI less than 18.5 or greater than 60 kg/m∘2 or if the surgical time was less than 45 seconds or greater than 180 minutes, and bilateral surgery. Data was obtained from querying the health system's inpatient database containing information for all joint replacements within the system. Patients were compared in two groups: those who received a RRP after surgery versus those who received traditional post-op care. The main outcome measure was all-cause 30-day readmissions. Multivariate logistic regression was used to calculate the odds for all-cause 30-day readmission for patients who received RRP versus traditional care when controlling for age, gender, race, insurance status (Medicare versus no Medicare), obesity, diabetes, renal disease, tobacco use, and ASA score (less than 3 versus 3 or greater).Introduction
Methods
