While total knee arthroplasty has demonstrated clinical success, final bone cut and final component alignment can be critical for achieving a desired overall limb alignment. This cadaver study investigated whether robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA) allows for accurate bone cuts and component position to plan compared to manual technique. Six cadaveric specimens (12 knees) were prepared by an experienced user of manual total knee arthroplasty (MTKA), who was inexperienced in RATKA. For each cadaveric pair, a RATKA was prepared on the right leg and a MTKA was prepared on the left leg. Final bone cuts and final component position to plan were measured relative to fiducials, and mean and standard deviations were compared. Measurements of final bone cut error for each cut show that RATKA had greater accuracy and precision to plan for femoral anterior internal/external (0.8±0.5° vs. 2.7±1.9°) and flexion/extension* (0.5±0.4° vs. 4.3±2.3°), anterior chamfer varus/valgus* (0.5±0.1° vs. 4.1±2.2°) and flexion/extension (0.3±0.2° vs. 1.9±1.0°), distal varus/valgus (0.5±0.3° vs. 2.5±1.6°) and flexion/extension (0.8±0.5° vs. 1.1±1.1°), posterior chamfer varus/valgus* (1.3±0.4° vs. 2.8±2.0°) and flexion/extension (0.8±0.5° vs. 1.4±1.6°), posterior internal/external* (1.1±0.6° vs. 2.8±1.6°) and flexion/extension (0.7±0.6° vs. 3.7±4.0°), and tibial varus/valgus* (0.6±0.3° vs. 1.3±0.7°) rotations, compared to MTKA, respectively, (where * indicates a significant difference between the two operative methods based on 2- Variances testing, with α at 0.05). Measurements of final component position error show that RATKA had greater accuracy and precision to plan for femoral varus/valgus* (0.6±0.3° vs. 3.0±1.4°), flexion/extension* (0.6±0.5° vs. 3.0±2.1°), internal/external (0.8±0.5° vs. 2.6±1.6°), and tibial varus/valgus (0.7±0.4° vs. 1.1±0.8°) than the MTKA control, respectively. In general, RATKA demonstrated greater accuracy and precision of bone cuts and component placement to plan, compared to MTKA in this cadaveric study. For further confirmation, RATKA accuracy of component placement should be investigated in a clinical setting.
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most common orthopaedic procedures performed, and is projected to exponentially increase over the next 20 years. As primary TKA cases increase, so does the frequency of revisions. The primary goals for all TKA cases include alleviating pain and improving overall knee function. The objective of this study was to evaluate the change in outcomes as measured by the Knee Society Score (KSS) between primary and revision TKA systems. This data was collected as part of three prospective, post-market, multicenter studies comparing preoperative to 6-week data. Patients were stratified into two groups based on type of single radius knee device; Posteriorly Stabilized (PS) group and Total Stabilizer (TS) group. Early clinical outcomes based on the KSS and operative data were used to compare groups.1) INTRODUCTION
2) METHODS
This study evaluates the impact of radii-related differences in posterior cruciate ligament retaining (PCR) primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) prosthetic designs on knee biomechanics during level walking 1-year after surgery. The multi-radius (MR) design creates at least two instantaneous flexion axes by changing the radius of curvature of the femoral component throughout the arc of knee motion. The femoral component of the single-radius (SR) design has only one radius and therefore a fixed axis. Subjects scheduled for computer-navigated TKA (n = 37: SR n = 20 [9M, 11F], MR n = 17 [8M, 9F]; 69.8 ± 7.1 years, 87.6 ± 20.8 kg, 1.68 ± 0.09 m), and demographic-matched controls without knee pathology n = 23 [13M, 10F], provided informed consent under the Banner IRB (Sun Health panel). All surgical subjects received similar pre-, peri-, and post-operative care under the direction of three surgeons from a single orthopedic practice. Position and force data were collected using 28 reflective markers (modified Helen Hayes [Kadaba et al 1990]) tracked by ten digital IR cameras (120 Hz) (Motion Analysis Corp., Santa Rosa, CA) and four force platforms (1200 Hz) (AMTI, Watertown, MA) embedded in an 8m walkway. Data were recorded and smoothed (Butterworth filter, 6 Hz) using EVaRT 5.0.4 software (Motion Analysis Corp.). Gait cycle parameters were calculated using the ‘Functional Hip Center’ and ‘Original Knee Axis’ models in Orthotrak 6.6.1 (Motion Analysis Corp.). Data from each group were height and weight normalized and ensemble averaged by affected limb (right limb for controls) using custom code written in Labview (National Instruments Corp, Austin, TX). Descriptive statistics for the maximum and minimum knee kinematic, kinetic, and temporal spatial values in the stance and swing phases of the gait cycle were generated for each group. Between-group comparisons were made using an ANOVA with post hoc testing as appropriate (SPSS 14.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL)).Introduction:
Methods:
Revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be very complex in nature with difficulties/obstacles involving bone and soft tissue deficits, visualization and exposure, as well as alignment and fixation. Auxiliary devices such as augmentation and offset adapters help address these issues; however they increase the complexity of the reconstruction. The objective of this study was to show that use of a single radius revision TKA system allowing for minimal auxiliary revision devices can yield positive early clinical outcomes. This data was collected as part of a prospective, post-market, multicenter study. One hundred and twenty-five single radius revision TKA cases were evaluated. Surgical details were reviewed and cases were grouped based on type of auxiliary devices used. Group 1 included cases that used only femoral and/or tibial augments. Group 2 used femoral and/or tibial augments in conjunction with femoral and/or tibial offset adapters. Early clinical outcomes, operative data and radiographic findings were used to compare cases.Introduction:
Methods:
Minimally invasive, computer navigated techniques are gaining popularity for total knee replacement (TKA). While these techniques may have the potential to provide improved functional outcomes with more rapid recovery, little quantitative data exists comparing long-term gait function following surgery with different exposure approaches. This study compares functional gait differences between surgical approach groups two year following TKA. Kinetics, kinematics, and temporospatial parameters were assessed to determine if differences exist between groups in long term follow-up. This study was approved by the Banner IRB (Sun Health Panel). 95 subjects volunteered to participate in the study and signed informed consent prior to testing. The subjects were prospectively randomized to one of four surgical approach groups, mini-midvastus (MV), mini-subvastus (SV), mini-parapatellar (MP), and standard parapatellar (SP). These subjects were also compared to 45 age-matched, asymptomatic controls. Surgery was performed by one of two fellowship trained orthopedic surgeons specializing in adult reconstruction. Subjects were assessed in the gait laboratory two years after receiving surgery. Three dimensional kinetic and kinematic data were captured using a ten-camera passive marker system, a modified Helen Hayes marker set (Eagle-4, Motion Analysis, Santa Rosa, CA), and four floor embedded force platforms (AMTI Inc., Watertown, MA). Subjects were instructed to walk at a self selected speed down an 8 meter walkway. Kinetic and kinematic data were post processed using EVaRT and OrthoTrak 6.23 biomechanical software (Motion Analysis, Santa Rosa, CA). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (v14.0, SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL) and included a one-way ANOVA and post hoc testing.Introduction
Methods
Recent studies indicated that the knee has a single flexion/extension axis but debated the location of this axis. The relationship of the flexion/extension axis in the coronal plane to the mechanical axis has received little attention. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship of the various axes and references with respect to the mechanical axis in the coronal plane Subjects were prospectively scanned into a Virtual Bone Database (Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ). Database is a collection of body CT scans from subjects collected globally. Only CT Scans that met the following qualifications were accepted: ≤1 mm voxels and had slice thickness that was equal to the spacing between the slices (≤ 1.0mm). For each CT Scan, a frontal plane was created through the 2 most posterior points of the medial/lateral condyles and the most posterior point of the trochanter. Then, a transverse plane was created perpendicular to the frontal plane and bisects the 2 most distal points on the medial/lateral condyles. Finally, a saggital plane was created that was perpendicular to the frontal and transversal planes. The following axes were identified: Mechanical Axis of the Femur (MAF) (line between the center of the femoral head and the center of the knee sulcus); Transepicondylar Axis Posterior Cylindrical Axis (PCA) (line between the Medial/Lateral Condylar Circle – best fit circle to three points identified on surface). Measurements made: Angle of MAF and the Joint-Line (Femoral Joint Angle), Angle of the MAF and the Transepicondylar Axis (Femoral TE Angle), and Angle of the MAF and the Posterior Cylindrical Axis (Femoral PC angle). Angles measuring 90° were neutral or perpendicular to the MAF. Angles measured <90° were valgus and >90° were varus.INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The current standard of care for postoperative support during ambulation is a walker and accompanying gait belt. The use of a walker necessitates awkward body positioning, adequate upper body strength, and prohibits natural foot over foot progression during gait. Additionally, use of a gait belt necessitates that the therapist remains immediately beside or behind the patient, limiting the view of the patient's gait pattern and placing the therapist and patient at risk should the patient fall. The Secure Tracks™ (Fig 1) is a patient support device which runs in an overhead track and supports the patient in the periaxillary region, providing a more natural body position and foot progression while limiting the risk of falls. This prospective randomized study compares the rate of ambulation and other clinical outcomes measures in a population of total knee replacement recipients postoperatively. A total of 31 unilateral total knee recipients were enrolled in this prospective randomized comparison between the standard of care gait training and the Secure Tracks device. IRB approval was obtained from the relevant oversight board. Patients were permitted to weight-bear as tolerated starting the evening of their surgical procedure. Patients were instructed to walk until they felt fatigued or unsafe and were not encouraged or discouraged to stop. The therapists tracked the distance each patient walked during each of their ambulation sessions and also recorded any incidence of falls or other adverse events. A timed up and go test (TUG) and Visual Analogue Scale for pain (VAS) were also administered at the time of consent, at discharge from the hospital, and at the 2 week clinic followup appointment.Introduction
Methods
