Dual Mobility (DM) Total Hip Replacements (THRs), are becoming widely used but function in-vivo is not fully understood.

The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of impingement of a modular dual mobility with that of a standard cup.

A geometrical model of one subject's bony anatomy \[1\] was developed, a THR was implanted with the cup at a range of inclination and anteversion positions (Corail® stem, Pinnacle® cup (DePuy Synthes)). Two DM variants and one STD acetabular cup were modelled. Joint motions were taken from kinematic data of activities of daily living associated with dislocation \[2\] and walking. The occurrence of impingement was assessed for each component combination, orientation and activity. Implant-implant impingement can occur between the femoral neck and the metal or PE liner (DM or STD constructs respectively) or neck-PE mobile liner (DM only).

The results comprise a colour coded matrix which sums the number of impingement events for each cup position and activity and for each implant variant.

Neck-PE mobile liner impingement, occurred for both DM sizes, for all activities, and most cup placement positions indicating that the PE mobile liner is likely to move at the start of all activities including walking.

For all constructs no placement positions avoided neck-metal (DM) or neck-PE liner (STD) impingementevents in all activities. The least number of events occurred at higher inclination and anteversion component positions. In addition to implant-implant impingement, some instances of bone-bone and implant-bone impingement were also observed.

Consistent with DM philosophy, neck-PE mobile liner impingement and liner motion occurred for all activities including walking. Neck-liner impingement frequency was comparable between both DM sizes (metal liner) and a standard cup (PE liner).

Dual Mobility (DM) Total Hip Replacements (THRs) were introduced to reduce dislocation risk, which is the most common cause of early revision. The in-vivo mechanics of these implants is not well understood, despite their increased use in both elective and trauma settings. Therefore, the aim of this study was to comprehensively assess retrieved DM polyethylene liners for signs of damage using visual inspection and semi-quantitative geometric assessment techniques.

Retrieved DM liners (n=20) were visually inspected for the presence of seven established modes of polyethylene damage. If embedded debris was identified on the external surface, its material composition was characterised using energy-dispersive x-ray analysis (EDX). Additionally, each liner was geometrically assessed for signs of wear/deformation using a validated methodology.

Visual inspection of the liners revealed that scratching and pitting were the most common damage modes on either surface. Burnishing was observed on 50% and 15% of the internal and external surfaces, respectively. In addition, embedded debris was identified on 25% of the internal and 65% of the external surfaces. EDX analysis of the debris identified several materials including iron, titanium, cobalt-chrome, and tantalum. Geometric analysis demonstrated highly variable damage patterns across the liners.

The results of this study provide insight into the in-vivo mechanics of DM bearings. For example, the results suggest that the internal bearing (i.e., between the head and liner) acts as the primary articulation site for DM-THRs as evidenced by a higher incidence of burnishing and larger, more concentrated regions of penetration across the liners’ internal surfaces. Furthermore, circumferential, and crescent-shaped damage patterns were identified on the articulating surfaces of the liners thus providing evidence that these components can rotate within the acetabular shell with varying degrees of mobility. The mechanics of DM bearings are complex and may be influenced by several factors (e.g., soft tissue fibrosis, patient activities) and thus further investigation is warranted.

Finally, the results of this study suggest that DM liners may be susceptible to ex-vivo surface damage and thus caution is advised when handling and/or assessing these types of components.

The 10 year survivorship of THR is generally over 95%. However, the incidence of revision is usually higher in year one. The most common reason being dislocation which at least in part is driven by inadequate range of motion (ROM) leading to impingement, subluxation and ultimately dislocation which is more frequently posterior. ROM is affected by patient activity, bone and component geometry, and component placement. To reduce the incidence of dislocation, supported by registry data, there has been an increase in the use of so-called ‘lipped’ liners. Whilst this increases joint stability, the theoretical ROM is reduced. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of lip placement on impingement.

A rigid body geometric model was incorporated into a CT scan hemi-pelvis and femur, with a clinically available THR virtually implanted. Kinematic activity data associated with dislocation was applied, comprising of five posterior and two anterior dislocation risk activities, resulting from anterior and posterior impingement respectively. Cup inclination and anteversion was varied (30°-70°, 0°-50° respectively) to simulate extremes of clinical outcomes. The apex position of a ‘lipped’ liner was rotated from the superior position, anteriorly and posteriorly in steps of 45°. Incidence and location of implant and bone impingement was recorded in 5346 cases generated.

A liner with the lip placed superior increased the occurrence of implant-implant impingement compared with a neutral liner. Rotation of the lip from superior reduced this incidence. This effect was more marked with posterior rotation which after 90° reduced anterior impingement to levels similar to a neutral liner. Complete inversion of the lipped liner reduced impingement, but this and anterior rotation both negate its function – additional stability.

This study comprises one bone geometry and component design and one set of activity profiles. Nevertheless, it indicates that appropriate lip placement can minimise the likelihood of impingement for a range of daily activities whilst still providing additional joint stability.