header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_2 | Pages 45 - 45
10 Feb 2023
Kollias C Conyard C Formosa M Page R Incoll I
Full Access

Physician health is a global concern, with increasing research efforts directed towards the challenge. Australia has limited published specialty-specific well-being data for trainees and consultants in medicine and surgery. We measured distress in Australian Orthopaedic trainees using the Physician Well-Being Index (PWBI, MedEd Web Solutions) using an online anonymous survey sent by the Australian Orthopaedic Association.

The survey response rate was 38% (88/230). Forty-four percent of survey respondents met criteria for distress. Self-reported burnout in the 30 days prior was reported by 63% of respondents. Fifty-eight percent of females and 41% of males met criteria for distress. Of the 19% or respondents identifying as an ethnic minority, 53% were distressed compared to 42% of those identifying as non-ethnic minority. Trainees without a mentor had a 50% distress rate compared to those with a mentor (37% distress rate). Twenty-five percent of all trainees wished they had picked a career outside of medicine and 16% wished they had pursued a medical career other than Orthopaedic Surgery. Of those trainees who had already passed the fellowship exam, 17% wished they had pursued a career outside of medicine and 21% wished they had pursued a medical career in an area other than Orthopaedic Surgery.

These findings suggest concerning rates of career regret and gender-related trends in distress in Australian Orthopaedic trainees. Females may be over-represented in our results as 17% of the source population was female compared to 22% of respondents. Further research is required across all Australian specialties to gain further understanding of factors contributing to distress and to assist in the development of strategy to protect against physician burnout.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 181 - 181
1 Mar 2010
Incoll I
Full Access

A new technique of trapeziometacarpal suspension arthroplasty is described.

Suspension arthroplasty as a treatment for trape-ziometacarpal arthritis has been studied extensively in the literature, but only using relatively weak forms of tendon-bone fixation. Interference screw fixation for tendon grafts has been proven in other areas of the body such as the knee and shoulder. Our technique involves trapeziectomy and suspension arthroplasty using one half of the flexor carpi radialis tendon, left attached distally. A short segment (approximately 2 cm) is harvested and passed through a 4 mm drill hole in the proximal thumb metacarpal. This is accurately positioned using an initial K-wire and then a cannulated drill. Fixation is achieved with a 4 mm Bio-tenodesis screw (Arthrex) and enhanced using a 4/0 Fibrewire (Arthrex) Krackow suture weave. Due to the strength of fixation, no supplemental fixation is required and immobilisation is only used in the initial postoperative period. There is no need for additional support in the form of tendon interposition.

Although these are preliminary results, this technique shows promise for an improvement in outcome for the surgical treatment of thumb carpometacarpal arthritis, compared to current methods


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 86-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 478 - 478
1 Apr 2004
Incoll I Bateman E Myers A
Full Access

Introduction A randomised, double blind controlled study of the short term results of single portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) versus open carpal tunnel release (OCTR) is presented.

Methods Twenty patients undergoing bilateral carpal tunnel release were inducted into the study. Each patient had one side performed as an ECTR and the other as an OCTR. The side that ECTR was performed on was randomised. Assessment was performed at one, two and six weeks post-operatively by the patient and a blinded hand therapist. The patient was blinded at the one week review. Assessment looked at pain, function and satisfaction, as well as objective strength and motion.

Results All patients prefered the side of the endoscopic release at one, two and six weeks. ECTR was associated with less pain, greater ease of use, improved strength and better motion.

Conclusions There is a significantly improved short term outcome, on both subjective and objective measures, with endoscopic carpal tunnel release compared to open carpal tunnel release.