Many hospitals do not have a structured process
of consent, the attainment of which can often be rather ‘last-minute’
and somewhat chaotic. This is a surprising state of affairs as spinal
surgery is a high-risk surgical specialty with potential for expensive
litigation claims. More recently, the Montgomery ruling by the United
Kingdom Supreme Court has placed the subject of informed consent
into the spotlight. There is a paucity of practical guidance on how a consent process
can be achieved in a busy clinical setting. The British Association
of Spinal Surgeons (BASS) has convened a working party to address
this need. To our knowledge this is the first example of a national
professional body, representing a single surgical specialty, taking such
a fundamental initiative. In a hard-pressed clinical environment, the ability to achieve
admission reliably on the day of surgery, in patients at ease with
their situation and with little likelihood of late cancellation,
will be of great benefit. It will reduce litigation and improve
the patient experience. Cite this article:
To assess whether oncologists are adhering to the NICE guidelines on MSCC. All patients who received radiotherapy for metastatic spinal cord compression from 1st June 2009 – 1st June 2010 were identified. This information was then compared to the data collected via the MSCC Coordinator. The notes and radiological investigations were reviewed by the spinal consultant. 34 patients received radiotherapy for MSCC, 15 patients were not referred to the spinal team prior to radiotherapy. On reviewing each individual case 2 patients may have potentially benefited from surgical intervention.Aim
Methods and Results
To determine whether measuring pedicle size on CT is accurate and reproducible using the WEBPACS ruler tool Radiological analysis. A human cadaveric spine along with 5 geometrical shapes were scanned using a multislice spiral CT scanner with 1mm cuts. The objects and the pedicle diameters for lumbar and thoracic vertebrae in the axial plane were measured independently using the WEBPACS ruler tool by 2 observers (to the nearest 0.1mm). The geometrical shapes and pedicle size on the skeleton were then measured using Vernier callipers by an independent third observer. All measurements were repeated a week later. Reproducibility of the measurements was assessed using Bland and Altman plots. Accuracy was assessed using the Vernier calliper measurements as the gold standard and comparing the plots. Perfect reproducibility was achieved when measuring the geometric objects with the Vernier callipers. The error of the measurement associated when measuring the pedicles was 0.5mm. The error of the measurement for the geometric objects for observers 1 and 2 was 0.5 and 0.6mm respectively, and for the pedicles it was 1.0 and 0.6mm respectively. The WEBPACS ruler on a CT scan is accurate to within 0.5-0.6mm of the true size of an object. The error for pedicle measurements is marginally higher (0.6-1.0mm) and this may reflect the fact that they are ill defined geometric shapes. Measuring pedicle size on CT for surgical planning may have implications for small pedicles when sizing them up for a good screw. Ethics approval None Interest Statement None
Pedicle screw systems are now the commonest method of achieving posterior spinal fixation. Surgical planning in spinal surgery may include measuring pedicle size to guide screw size on WEBPACS. We performed a study to determine whether measuring pedicle size on CT is accurate and reproducible using the WEBPACS ruler tool. A human cadaveric spine along with 5 geometrical shapes were scanned using a multislice spiral CT scanner with 1mm cuts. The objects and the pedicle diameters for lumbar and thoracic vertebrae in the axial plane were measured independently using the WEBPACS ruler tool by 2 observers (to the nearest 0.1mm). The geometrical shapes and pedicle size on the skeleton were then measured using Vernier callipers by an independent third observer. All measurements were repeated a week later. The WEBPACS ruler on a CT scan is accurate to within 0.5-0.6mm of the true size of an object. The error for pedicle measurements is marginally higher (0.6-1.0mm) and this may reflect the fact that they are ill defined geometric shapes. Measuring pedicle size on CT for surgical planning may have implications for small pedicles when sizing them up for a good screw.
Peninsula Spinal Unit, Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Royal Devon and Exeter Foundation NHS Trust, Exeter, UK. A retrospective audit in 2000 of cases presenting with metastatic cord compression (MSCC) was conducted. In June 2009 we introduced the role of MSCC coordinator. We present the preliminary results from a 6 month comparative audit and discuss whether implementation of the NICE Guidelines have improved the care pathway. Prospective cohort study with retrospective controlled group. Adults with suspected MSCC Length of time to MR imaging % referred for surgical opinion Length of time on bed rest. % undergoing surgery Retrospective audit 2000 38 cases confirmed MSCC. 11 did not have MRI and were treated on the basis of clinical symptoms. Average time from admission to MRI 42 hours. 8 patients (21%) referred for surgical opinion. None had surgery 38 had radiotherapy. Spinal stability documented on 1 patient. 5.5 days average bed rest Prospective audit 2009 54 patients referred to co-ordinator as suspected MSCC. 52 had MRI and 2 had CT. Average time from referral to MRI 41 hours. Average time for patients with neurological deficit 7.6 hours. 54 patients (100%) referred for surgical opinion. 12 patients had surgery (22%). 100% patients had spinal stability documented. Average length of time on bed rest 2 days. It is uncertain whether these results are attributed to the introduction of the NICE guidelines or improved awareness of condition. However we feel that NICE guidelines have improved the care pathway of patients with MSCC. Statement of ethics and interests: Study was approved and registered with audit department.
Patients with solitary spinal metastases from Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) have better prognosis and survival rates compared to other spinal metastatic disease. Adjuvant therapy has been proven ineffective. Selected patients can be treated with Total En bloc Spondylectomy (TES) for solitary intra-osseous metastasis in the thoracolumbar spine secondary to renal cell carcinoma. Five patients with solitary vertebral metastasis secondary to RCC underwent TES for radical resection of the spinal pathology after pre-operative embolisation. The procedure involves en bloc laminectomy and corpectomy with posterior instrumented fusion and anterior instrumentation with cage reconstruction following the spondylectomy. All patients were fully staged pre-operatively and assessed according to the Tokuhashi scoring system. Recurrence of spinal metastasis and radiological failure of reconstruction All patients demonstrated full neurological recovery and reported significant pain relief. One patient died at 11 months post-op due to a recurrence of the primary. The other four are well at 24, 45, 52 and 66 months post-op without evidence of recurrence in the spine. There were no major surgical complications. Careful patient selection is required to justify this procedure. The indication is limited to solitary intra-osseous lesions where complete resection of the tumour is possible. The main advantage of this treatment is that it affords significant pain relief and restores spinal stability whilst minimizing local recurrence.
All pre-operative parameters were significantly higher compared with the Normal group (back pain VAS 6.3 and 3.8; leg pain VAS 7 and 4.7; ODI 61 and 34.4 respectively). At 1 year follow-up, 23% of the somatising patients became psychologically Normal; 36% became At Risk; 11% became Distressed Depressed; and 30% remained Distressed Somatisers. The postoperative VAS for back and leg pain of the 11 patients who had become psychologically Normal was 3.4 (pre-op 6.8) and 3.2 (pre-op 6.6) respectively. In the 14 patients who remained Distressed Somatisers the corresponding figures were 5.6 (pre-op 7.8) and 6.7 (pre-op 7.0). The postoperative ODI of the 11 patients who had become psychologically Normal was 26.4 (pre-op 55.5). In the 14 patients who remained Distressed Somatisers the corresponding figures were 56.7 (pre-op 61.7). These differences are statistically significant.
