Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Applied filters
General Orthopaedics

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 134 - 134
1 Apr 2019
Adekanmbi I Ehteshami Z Hunt C Dressler M
Full Access

Introduction

In cementless THA the incidence of intraoperative fracture has been reported to be as high 28% [1]. To mitigate these surgical complications, investigators have explored vibro-acoustic techniques for identifying fracture [2–5]. These methods, however, must be simple, efficient, and robust as well as integrate with workflow and sterility. Early work suggests an energy-based method using inexpensive sensors can detect fracture and appears robust to variability in striking conditions [4–5]. The orthopaedic community is also considering powered impaction as another way to minimize the risk of fracture [6– 8], yet the authors are unaware of attempts to provide sensor feedback perhaps due to challenges from the noise and vibrations generated during powered impaction. Therefore, this study tests the hypothesis that vibration frequency analysis from an accelerometer mounted on a powered impactor coupled to a seated femoral broach can be used to distinguish between intact and fractured bone states.

Methods

Two femoral Sawbones (Sawbones AB Europe, SKU 1121) were prepared using standard surgical technique up to a size 4 broach (Summit, Depuy Synthes). One sawbone remained intact, while a calcar fracture approximately 40mm in length was introduced into the other sawbone. Broaching was performed with a commercially available pneumatic broaching system (Woodpecker) for approximately 4 secs per test (40 impactions/sec) with hand-held support. Tests were repeated 3 times for fractured and intact groups as well as a ‘control’ condition with the broach handle in mid-air (ie not inserted into the sawbone).

Two accelerometers (PCB M353B18) positioned on the femoral condyle and the Woodpecker impactor captured vibration data from bone-broach-impactor system (Fig1).

Frequency analysis from impaction strikes were postprocessed (Labview). A spectrogram and area under FFT (AUFFT) [4] were analysed for comparisons between fractured and intact bone groups using a nested ANOVA.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 8 - 8
1 Apr 2019
Adekanmbi I Ehteshami Z Hunt C Dressler M
Full Access

Introduction

In Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA), proper bone preparation technique is fundamental to preventing intraoperative fracture. Anecdotally, surgeons suggest they can avoid fracture by listening for changes in the pitch of a mallet strike during broaching. Consequently, it is not surprising that researchers have explored vibroacoustic methods to prevent [1] and identify bone fractures [2, 3]. For instance, a shift in frequency of the acoustic signals during impaction has been correlated with initial stability [4, 5]. In-spite of these research-based successes, we are unaware of an intraoperative application for THA. We submit that idiosyncratic variability during impaction [6] may overwhelm analytical techniques developed in a controlled laboratory environment. The purpose of this test, therefore, was to evaluate the effect of several strike parameters on the vibro-acoustic response during impaction. Specifically, we hypothesized that the angle, location, and force of impaction would produce ‘false-positives’ in frequency regions that have been used to identify fracture [7].

Methods

A Sawbones femur (SKU1121, Medium) was prepared and broached using standard surgical technique for the Summit hip system (DePuy Synthes) progressing from size 0 to 4. The size 4 broach was firmly seated and impacted ten times (n=10) for each of the prescribed conditions (Table 1) while securely holding the femur by hand. Vibroacoustic data from an accelerometer attached distally on the femur and a directional microphone located within 1 metre (Figure 1) were acquired at a sampling rate of 40kHz and postprocessed using LabView. Spectrograms were generated for qualitative comparisons, while fast fourier transform (FFT) with normalised amplitudes for each strike facilitated quantitative analysis of the area under the FFT curve (AU-FFT). Strike conditions were monitored to ensure the groups were consistent and distinct (Table 1).


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 20 - 20
1 Feb 2017
Horne D Grostefon J Hunt C Della Valle C Schmalzried T
Full Access

Introduction

The benefits of femoral head-neck modularity in hip surgery have been recognized for decades. However, reports of head/neck taper fretting & corrosion has led to research being conducted, yet the clinical effect of these processes remains unclear. Whilst femoral head size, material and the characteristics of the taper have been a focus of research, potential contributing variables such as in vivo head-neck assembly technique on the performance of these connections is not clear. We performed an observational study to investigate variation in femoral head-neck taper assembly during surgery, with the initial focus being the number of head impactions.

Methods

From May 2013 to October 2014, nineteen surgeons who specialized in hip surgery from a wide demographic (North America, Europe and Asia) participated in a video review on current surgical practice in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The surgeons were unaware of any specific parameter, including taper assembly, which would subsequently be analyzed. Twenty-seven THA surgeries were reviewed against a specific set of questions relating to factors in the modular femoral head-neck assembly process. The focus of the current study was the number of impaction blows to seat the modular femoral head on the implanted stem.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 97-B, Issue 4 | Pages 434 - 441
1 Apr 2015
Shabani F Farrier AJ Krishnaiyan R Hunt C Uzoigwe CE Venkatesan M

Drug therapy forms an integral part of the management of many orthopaedic conditions. However, many medicines can produce serious adverse reactions if prescribed inappropriately, either alone or in combination with other drugs. Often these hazards are not appreciated. In response to this, the European Union recently issued legislation regarding safety measures which member states must adopt to minimise the risk of errors of medication.

In March 2014 the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency and NHS England released a Patient Safety Alert initiative focussed on errors of medication. There have been similar initiatives in the United States under the auspices of The National Coordinating Council for Medication Error and The Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. These initiatives have highlighted the importance of informing and educating clinicians.

Here, we discuss common drug interactions and contra-indications in orthopaedic practice. This is germane to safe and effective clinical care.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:434–41.