Internet delivered interventions may provide a route to rapid support for behavioural self-management for low back pain (LBP) that could be widely applied within primary care. Although evidence is emerging that more complex technologies (mobile apps linked to digital wristbands) can have some impact on LBP-related disability, there is a need to determine the effectiveness of highly accessible, web-based support for self-management for LBP. We conducted a multi-centre pragmatic randomised controlled trial, testing ‘SupportBack’, an accessible internet intervention developed specifically for primary care. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of the SupportBack interventions in reducing LBP-related physical disability in primary care patients. Participants were randomised to 1 of 3 arms: 1) Usual care + internet intervention + physiotherapy telephone support, 2) Usual care + internet intervention, 3) Usual care alone. Utilising a repeated measures design, the primary outcome for the trial was disability over 12 months using the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months. Results: 826 were randomised, with follow-up rates: 6 weeks = 83%; 3 months = 72%; 6 months = 70%; 12 months = 79%. Analysis is ongoing, comparing each intervention arm versus usual care alone. The key results will be presented at the conference.Background
Methods and results
Much has been written about ESP (Extended Scope Practitioners) lead clinical services, the vast majority of which have been developed in secondary care. Little evidence is available on the efficacy of ESP. clinics either for both the patient and weather they stream line back pain treatment. We present an interim audit of an assessment pathway for community management and MDT practice for lower back pain. 56 patients were reviewed with a revised ESP assessment tool and then presented to an MDT meeting. Each, assessment was 45 minutes long and outcome measures used included ODI and STaRT scores. Patients were telephoned at 12 weeks following their appointment and then at 18 weeks, to ascertain the progress they were making and to see if the 18-week target had been met. 56 patients were reviewed from September 2009. The average ODI, was 63%, and 56% at 12 weeks; most patients had a STaRT score of 6, and 3 on the psychological component it the beginning of the study. The EQ-5D scores were observed to show an improvement. MRI rates were 3.8% and the DNA rate was 7%. A total of 11 MRI requests; the results of 7 of these were available for analysis. The scans that were requested all showed a disc lesion that was amenable to surgical decompression or stabilization. Overall patients were very satisfied. Our formatted methodology allowed clinical governance at source to measure the efficacy of patient treatment. Early results suggest an efficient in delivering an acceptable standard of care as long as they are properly supported.
