We would like to present this case series of 10 adolescent patients with displaced, closed diaphyseal tibial fractures managed using the Taylor Spatial Frame. Management options for these injuries include non-operative treatment, antegrade nailing, flexible nailing systems, plating and external circular fixation. External circular fixation allows anatomical reduction avoiding potential complications such as growth arrest associated with antegrade nailing and retained metal work with plating. Flexible nailing system and cast immobilisation are unreliable for precise anatomical reduction. With limited evidence as to the extent of post-traumatic deformity that is acceptable, combined with the limited remodeling potential that this patient group possess, the precision of percutaneous fixation with the Taylor Spatial Frame system has clear advantages. This is a retrospective analysis of 10 adolescent patients with a mean age of 14.5 years (range 13 to 16 years). Data collected includes fracture configuration, deformity both pre and post operatively compared to post frame removal, length of time in frame and complications. The data was gathered using the patient case notes and the Picture Archiving and Communications System. The mean time in frame was 15.5 weeks (range 11 to 22 weeks). One non-union in a cigarette smoker was successfully managed with a second Taylor Spatial Frame episode. Our conclusion was that with careful patient selection the Taylor Spatial Frame allows successful treatment of closed tibial fractures in adolescents, avoiding complications such as growth arrest and post-traumatic deformity as well as avoiding retained metalwork.
We would like to present this service evaluation of Taylor Spatial Frame use within a busy limb reconstruction unit. We present a cohort of 60 patients representing a year of work from January 2011 to January 2012 with a breakdown of coding data. Included are details of operative episodes, length of stay, outpatient follow up including software programming episodes, strut changes and general frame care from our specialist nurses. We have produced a comparison of cost to HRG coding tarifs with an audit of coding errors and cost implications of these corrections. Also included is a breakdown of comparison data from patients undergoing frame assisted deformity correction and internal fixation, Computer Hexapod Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery. Exact and careful coding of these procedures is required considering their relatively high cost.
