Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_8 | Pages 40 - 40
11 Apr 2023
Mahdi H Hardisty M Fullerton K Huang C Vachhani K Nam D Whyne C
Full Access

µCT images are commonly analysed to assess changes in bone density and architecture in preclinical murine models. Several platforms provide automated analysis of bone architecture parameters from volumetric regions of interest (ROI). However, segmentation of the regions of subchondral bone to create the volumetric ROIs remains a manual and time-consuming task. This study aimed to develop and evaluate automated pipelines for trabecular bone architecture analysis of mouse proximal tibia subchondral bone.

A segmented dataset involving 62 knees (healthy and arthritic) from 10-week male C57BL/6 mice were used to train a U-Net type architecture, with µCT scans (downsampled) input that output segmentation and bone volume density (BV/TV) of the subchondral trabecular bone. Segmentations were upsampled and used in tandem with the original scans (10µ) as input for architecture analysis along with the thresholded trabecular bone. The analysis considered the manually and U-Net segmented ROIs using two available pipelines: the ITKBoneMorphometry library and CTan (SKYSCAN). The analyses included: bone volume (BV), total volume (TV), BV/TV, trabecular number (TbN), trabecular thickness (TbTh), trabecular separation (TbSp), and bone surface density (BSBV).

There was good agreement for bone measures between the manual and U-Net pipelines utilizing ITK (R=0.88-0.98) and CTan (R=0.91-0.98). ITK and CTan showed good agreement for BV, TV, BV/TV, TbTh and BSBV (R=0.9-0.98). However, a limited agreement was seen between TbN (R=0.73) and TbSb (R=0.59) due to methodological differences in how spacing is evaluated.

This U-Net/ITK pipeline seamlessly automated both segmentation and quantification of the proximal tibia subchondral bone. This automated pipeline allows the analysis of large volumes of data, and its open-source nature may enable the standardization of stereologic analysis of trabecular bone across different research groups.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_7 | Pages 73 - 73
4 Apr 2023
Tolgyesi A Huang C Akens M Hardisty M Whyne C
Full Access

Bone turnover and microdamage are impacted by skeletal metastases which can contribute to increased fracture risk. Treatments for metastatic disease may further impact bone quality. This study aimed to establish an understanding of microdamage accumulation and load to failure in healthy and osteolytic vertebrae following cancer treatment (stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), zoledronic acid (ZA), or docetaxel (DTX)).

Forty-two 6-week old athymic female rats (Hsd:RH-Foxn1rnu, Envigo) were studied; 22 were inoculated with HeLa cervical cancer cells through intracardiac injection (day 0). Animals were randomly assigned to four groups: untreated (healthy=5, osteolytic=6), SBRT on day 14 (healthy=6, osteolytic=6), ZA on day 7 (healthy=4, osteolytic=5), and DTX on day 14 (healthy=5, osteolytic=5). Animals were euthanized on day 21. L1-L3 motion segments were compression loaded to failure and force-displacement data recorded. T13 vertebrae were stained with BaSO4 and µCT imaged (90kVp, 44uA, 4.9µm) to visualize microdamage location and volume. Damage volume fraction (DV/BV) was calculated as the ratio of BaSO4 to bone volume. Differences in mean load-to-failure were compared using three-way ANOVA (disease status, treatment, cells injected). Differences in mean DV/BV between treatment groups were compared using one-way ANOVA.

Treatment had a significant effect on load-to-failure (p=0.004) with ZA strengthening the healthy and osteolytic vertebrae. Reduced strength post SBRT seen in the metastatic (but not the healthy) group may be explained by greater tumor involvement secondary to higher cell injection concentrations. Untreated metastatic samples had higher DV/BV (16.25±2.54%) compared to all treatment groups (p<0.05) suggesting a benefit of treatment to bone quality.

Focal and systemic cancer treatments were shown to effect load-to-failure and microdamage accumulation in healthy and osteolytic vertebrae. Developing a better understanding of how treatments effect bone quality and mechanical stability is critical for effective management of patients with spinal metastases.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 89-B, Issue 3 | Pages 408 - 412
1 Mar 2007
Ma H Lu Y Kwok T Ho F Huang C Huang C

One of the most controversial issues in total knee replacement is whether or not to resurface the patella. In order to determine the effects of different designs of femoral component on the conformity of the patellofemoral joint, five different knee prostheses were investigated. These were Low Contact Stress, the Miller-Galante II, the NexGen, the Porous-Coated Anatomic, and the Total Condylar prostheses. Three-dimensional models of the prostheses and a native patella were developed and assessed by computer. The conformity of the curvature of the five different prosthetic femoral components to their corresponding patellar implants and to the native patella at different angles of flexion was assessed by measuring the angles of intersection of tangential lines.

The Total Condylar prosthesis had the lowest conformity with the native patella (mean 8.58°; 0.14° to 29.9°) and with its own patellar component (mean 11.36°; 0.55° to 39.19°). In the other four prostheses, the conformity was better (mean 2.25°; 0.02° to 10.52°) when articulated with the corresponding patellar component. The Porous-Coated Anatomic femoral component showed better conformity (mean 6.51°; 0.07° to 9.89°) than the Miller-Galante II prosthesis (mean 11.20°; 5.80° to 16.72°) when tested with the native patella. Although the Nexgen prosthesis had less conformity with the native patella at a low angle of flexion, this improved at mid (mean 3.57°; 1.40° to 4.56°) or high angles of flexion (mean 4.54°; 0.91° to 9.39°), respectively. The Low Contact Stress femoral component had the best conformity with the native patella (mean 2.39°; 0.04° to 4.56°). There was no significant difference (p > 0.208) between the conformity when tested with the native patella or its own patellar component at any angle of flexion.

The geometry of the anterior flange of a femoral component affects the conformity of the patellofemoral joint when articulating with the native patella. A more anatomical design of femoral component is preferable if the surgeon decides not to resurface the patella at the time of operation.