Knee osteoarthritis is common, disabling and can be effectively treated by total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In North America, consideration has been given to the varying outcomes amongst racial groups. However, scant attention has been paid to the outcomes of surgery in different racial groups found in the United Kingdom (UK). We investigated the results of surgery in one of the principal ethnic minorities in the UK; that of a south Asian population.

We retrospectively analysed our prospectively collected database at the Southern General Hospital, Glasgow. We identified 39 Asian patients who had TKA. They were age and sex matched to a Caucasian group. Mean follow up was 40.3 months.

Mean pre-operative oxford knee scores were poorer than in the Caucasian group (8.5 vs. 14.7, p=0.001.) Post operative oxford knee scores were similarly poorer in the Asian group (29.9 vs. 36.1, p=0.07.) Interestingly, the change in oxford knee scores was similar in both groups.

SF-12 and WOMAC scores demonstrated poorer pre and post operative scores in the Asian group. Knee flexion was greater in the Asian group, however (107.5° vs. 106.2°, p=0.742.)

We conclude that while patients of Asian origin have poorer post operative pain and function following TKA, they have a similar gain from surgery as do a Caucasian group and therefore surgery is effective intervention in this group. An important topic for further work is to identify why Asians present later in their arthritic disease process to healthcare professionals than do their Caucasian counterparts.

Hip resurfacing has generally been used in younger patients with early osteoarthritis of the hip. There has been considerable recent interest in this over the past few years. We conducted a prospective randomised trial comparing 2 hip resurfacing implants, Durom and ASR looking at radiological and clinical outcomes.

Forty-nine patients (78% male) with hip osteoarthritis which met the criteria for hip resurfacing were randomised to receive either a Durom or ASR resurfacing implant. These patients have so far been followed up for a minimum of one year. The groups were comparable in age (p=0.124) and gender (p=0.675). The average age in the ASR group was 54.04 years and in the Durom group it was 51.25.

Radiological views were scrutinised immediately post op and at final follow up so far to look at cup inclination, stem-shaft angle, and acetabular osseointegration.

Clinical outcomes were compared using the Oxford hip scores, WOMAC scores and SF12 scores.

At minimum follow up of 1 year the mean post operative Oxford hip score was not significantly different between the Durom (45.32, SD 3.93) and ASR (43.44, SD 8.44). The mean post operative WOMAC score was also not significantly different between the Durom (52.56, SD 6.06) and ASR (49.63, SD 2.23). There was no difference between the groups with regards to signs of osseointegration from radiological assessment (p=0.368). There were 3 periprosthetic femoral neck fractures (5.7%) and one revision for pain.

We conclude from this trial that there is no difference in the clinical or radiological findings between the Durom and ASR implants.

The objective was to compare vastus lateralis muscle splitting verses muscle sparing surgical approach to proximal femur for fixation of intertrochanteric fracture.

Of the 16 patients in this prospective randomised double blind study 8 were randomised to vastus lateralis muscle splitting and rest to muscle sparing group. Main outcome measurement was assessment of status of vastus lateralis muscle at 2 and 6 weeks using nerve conduction study. Preoperative demographics were identical for both the groups.

There was no statistically significant difference between the groups with regards to velocity, latency, and amplitude. The postoperative haemoglobin drop, heamatocrit, position of the dynamic hip screw and mobility status were identical.

Both clinical and neurophysiological outcome suggest that damage done to vastus lateralis either by splitting or elevating appears to be identical.

Prophylactic antibiotics administered prior to joint arthroplasty have become standard practice. Due to concern over the risk that 2nd generation cephalosporins posed to the elderly, as regards clostridium difficile associated infections the antimicrobial management team in our unit changed the protocol for prophylactic antibiotics. As of 1st September 2009, flucloxacillin and gentamicin were preferred over cefuroxime as the first choice of prophylactic antibiotic. However, it was noted that postoperatively patients were experiencing a decrease in renal function.

One hundred patients who underwent a total hip replacement following the policy change were randomly selected from the departmental joint arthroplasty database. This group was age and sex matched to 100 patients undergoing their surgery prior to the change. Data was collected on renal function, length of stay, antibiotic and age. Any change in renal function was categorised using the RIFLE criteria.

Exclusion secondary to variations from protocol or treatment for femoral neck fractures resulted in a total number of 156 patients with 78 in each arm. The average age for both groups was 64 years. Non-parametric analysis of preoperative and postoperative serum creatinine concentrations and Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) demonstrated a significant difference between the two groups, showing that GFR decreased (p=0.041) and serum creatinine concentration increased (p=0.037) in the cohort receiving gentamicin. Classing the impaired renal function as: risk, injury or failure (RIFLE criteria) demonstrated a statistically significant difference for any criterion positive (p=0.016) but no significant difference for the specific RIFLE groups (p=0.068).

Acknowledging the small numbers and potential confounders for renal impairment, this study was able to show a difference in renal function for patients receiving gentamicin over cefuroxime as prophylaxis for joint arthroplasty.

Anterior knee pain following primary total knee replacement (TKR) is a common problem with average reported rates in the literature of approximately 10%. Symptoms are frequently attributed to the patellofemoral joint, and the treatment of the patella during total knee replacement is controversial.

There is no article in the literature that the authors know of that has specifically evaluated the effect of patella rim cautery on TKR outcome. This is a denervation technique that has historically been employed, with no evidence base. A prospective comparative cohort study was performed to compare the outcome scores of patients who underwent circumferential patella rim cautery, with those who did not.

Patients who had undergone a primary TKR were identified from the unit's arthroplasty database. Two cohorts, who were age and gender matched, were established. None of the patients had their patella resurfaced, but all had a patellaplasty. The Low Contact Stress TKR (Depuy International) was used in all cases.

The effect of circumferential patella rim cautery on the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and the more anterior knee pain specific Patellar Score (PS) a minimum of 2 years post surgery was evaluated. Previous reports have suggested that a change of 5 points in the OKS represents a clinical difference. A sample size calculation based on an effect size of 5 points with 80% power and a p-value of 0.05 would require a minimum of 76 patients in each group.

There were 94 patients who had undergone patellaplasty only, and 98 patients who had supplementary circumferential patella rim cautery during their primary TKR. The mean OKS were 34.61 and 33.29 respectively (p=0.41), while the PS scores were 21.03 and 20.87 (p=0.87).

No statistically significant differences were noted between the groups for either outcome score. Patella rim cauterisation is unnecessary in primary TKR.

The diagnosis and treatment of hip disease in young adults has rapidly evolved over the past ten years. Despite the advancements of improved diagnostic skills and refinement of surgical techniques, the psychosocial impact hip disease has on the young adult has not yet been elucidated.

This observational study aimed to characterise the functional and psychosocial characteristics of a group of patients from our young hip clinic. 49 patients responded to a postal questionnaire which included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Median age was 20 years (range 16-38) with a gender ratio of 2:1 (female: male). The most common diagnoses were Perthes' disease and developmental hip dysplasia. More than half of our patients had moderate to severe pain based on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and at least a moderate disability based on the ODI. Thirty-two percent of patients were classified as having borderline to abnormal levels of depression and 49% of patients were classified as having borderline to abnormal levels of anxiety based on the HADS. Comparison of the ODI with the VAS and HADS anxiety and depression subscales showed a significant positive correlation (p<0.05). Multiple regression showed the ODI to be a significant predictor of the HADS anxiety and depression scores (regression coefficient 0.13, 95% confidence interval 0.06 to 0.21, p<0.05).

This study highlights the previously unrecognised psychosocial effects of hip disease in the young adult. A questionnaire which includes HADS may be of particular value in screening for depression and anxiety in young people with physical illness. This study also highlights that collaboration with psychologists and other health care providers may be required to achieve a multidisciplinary approach in managing these patients.