Introduction

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are one of the most common knee injuries amongst elite athletes and usually require an ACL reconstruction (ACLR) to enable return to sport. Secondary surgery can result in a longer rehabilitation period and often a

significant time away from sport which can have implications to the athlete including contract obligations and sponsorship. Advances in ACLR techniques and meniscal repair techniques as well as an awareness of meniscal root lesions, ramp lesions and lateral extraarticular procedures (LEAPs) during ACL surgery has improved outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rates of secondary surgery following the introduction of a systematic arthroscopic evaluation of the knee, improved meniscal repair techniques and the addition of a concomitant LEAP This systematic approach was introduced after October 2012 (10/2012).

Introduction

It has been contentious whether an anatomic double-bundle technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR)is superior to that of a single-bundle technique. It has been hypothesized in the literature that the double-bundle technique could provide function closer to that of the anatomical knee joint. The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term clinical outcomes after single-bundle ACLR versus double-bundle ACLR. We hypothesized that the double-bundle technique would not be superior to the single-bundle technique.

This aim of this study was to identify common factors in patients with the shortest length of hospital stay following total hip arthroplasty (THA). This would then allow a means of targeting suitable patients to reduce their length of stay.

This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing primary THA at our institution between September 2013 and August 2014. Demographic data were collected from the patient record. The cohort was divided into those discharged to home within two days of operation and the rest of the THA population. The demographics (age, gender, ASA grade, body mass index (BMI), primary diagnosis, socioeconomic status (Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation, SIMD and SIMD health domain) were compared between groups. In addition for the early discharge group information on comorbidities, family support at home and independent transport were collected.

The study cohort was 1292 patients. 119 patients were discharged home on the first post-operative day. Those discharged earlier were on average younger (p<0.0001), more likely to be male (p<0.0001) and had a lower ASA grade (p<0.00001). Other demographics did not differ between groups. Patients who were discharged early also appeared to have few comorbidities (Diabetes 5.9%, Cardiac disease 7.6%, Respiratory disease 9%), high levels of family support at home (95%) and high levels of independent transport arrangements (97%).

Factors associated with those patients with the shortest lengths of stay were identified. Such factors could be used to target patients who are suitable for streamlined recovery programmes aimed at early discharge after THA and assist with service planning.

Objectives

A successful outcome following treatment of nonunion requires the correct identification of all of the underlying cause(s) and addressing them appropriately. The aim of this study was to assess the distribution and frequency of causative factors in a consecutive cohort of nonunion patients in order to optimise the management strategy for individual patients presenting with nonunion.

In recent years there has been growing interest in enhanced recovery regimes in lower limb arthroplasty due to potential clinical benefits of early mobilisation along with cost-savings. Following adoption of this regime in a district general hospital, it was observed that traditional dressings were a potential barrier to its success with ongoing wound problems in patients otherwise fit for discharge. The aim of this audit was to assess current wound care practice, implement a potentially improved regime and re-evaluate practice.

A prospective clinical audit was performed over a three month period involving 100 patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty. Fifty patients with traditional dressings were evaluated prior to change in practice to a modern dressing (Aquacel™ Surgical). Fifty patients were then evaluated with the new dressing to complete the audit cycle. Clinical outcome measures included wear time, number of changes, blister rate and length of stay. Statistical comparisons were performed using Mann Whitney or Fisher's Exact test (statistical significance, p<0.05).

Wear time for the traditional dressing (2 days) was significantly shorter than the modern dressing (7 days), p<0.001, and required more changes (0 vs. 3 days), p<0.001. 20% of patients developed blisters with the traditional dressing compared with 4% with the modern dressing (p=0.028). Length of stay was the same for the modern dressing (4 days) compared with the traditional dressing (4 days). However, in the modern group 75% of patients were discharged by day 4 whereas in the traditional group this took until day 6.

This audit highlights the problems associated with traditional dressings with frequent early dressing changes, blistering and delayed discharge. These adverse outcomes can be minimised with a modern dressing specifically designed for the demands of lower limb arthroplasty. Units planning to implement enhanced recovery regimes should consider adopting this dressing to avoid compromising patient discharge.

The Medial Patellofemoral Ligament (MPFL) is the main restraining force against lateral patellar displacement. It is often disrupted following patellar subluxation or dislocation. MPFL reconstruction is frequently performed when conservative management fails and the patient experiences recurrent patellar dislocation. Various MPFL reconstruction procedures have been described in the literature and reported outcomes are encouraging. This study analyses the radiographic outcomes following MPFL reconstruction.

From January 2006 to January 2011, 76 consecutive patients (80 knees) with patellar recurrent dislocation underwent medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in three large teaching hospitals. Mean follow-up was 31.8 months (range, 13–72). Semitendinosus and gracilis autografts were used for the reconstruction and all procedures were carried out by the senior authors (WL, BR, CW, MB).

Plain radiographs (Anteroposterior (AP), Lateral and Skyline) performed preoperatively and postoperatively were used to compare the sulcus angle, congruence angle, lateral patellofemoral angle, trochlear dysplasia (Dejour classification), trochlear boss height and patellar height (Caton-Deschamps ratio). Plain radiographs (Lateral) performed postoperatively were used to evaluate the femoral tunnel placement used for MPFL reconstruction.

The sulcus angle improved from 143.2° (122.9–157.7) to 139.3° (115.7–154.6) and the congruence angle improved from 26.7° (−17.5–82.6) to 0.26° (−35.3–7.8). The lateral patellofemoral angle was 7.99° (3.2–19.2) preoperatively and 9.02° (3.2–18.2) postoperatively. The Caton-Deschamps ratio was 1.2 (1.0–1.5) preoperatively and 1.0 (0.8–1.1) postoperatively. Using the Dejour classification of trochlear dysplasia, all preoperative radiographs were considered to be grade C or D and all postoperative radiographs were considered to be grade A or B. Trochlear boss height was 5.9mm (1.8–11.6) preoperatively and 4.7mm (1.6–6.9) postoperatively. 59% of the femoral tunnels were considered to be in a good position on postoperative radiographs.

This study displayed a significant improvement in postoperative radiographic parameters, demonstrating the importance of anatomic restoration when performing MPFL reconstruction.

Introduction

Fracture non-union is a devastating cause of patient morbidity. The cost of NU treatment ranges from £7,000 to £79,000. With an estimated 11,700 cases in the UK pa the financial implications are huge, potentially costing several hundreds of million of pounds annually.

Successful outcome in the management of non-union is based upon correctly identifying the underlying cause(s) and addressing them appropriately.