Prosthetic Hip dislocations remain one of the most common major complications after total hip arthroplasty procedures, which has led to much debate and refinement geared to the optimization of implant and bearing options, surgical approaches, and technique. The implementation of larger femoral heads has afforded patients a larger excursion distance and primary arc range motion before impingement, leading to lowered risk of hip dislocation. However, studies suggest that while the above remains true, the use of larger heads may contribute to increased volumetric wear, trunnion related corrosion, and an overall higher prevalence of loosening, pain, and patient dissatisfaction, which may require revision hip arthroplasty. More novel designs such as the dual mobility hip have been introduced into the United States to optimize stability and range of motion, while possibly lowering the frictional torque and modes of failure associated with larger fixed bearing articulations. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the effect of bearing design and anatomic angles on frictional torque using a clinically relevant model8.

Two bearing designs at various anatomical angles were used; a fixed and a mobile acetabular component at anatomical angles of 0°,20°,35°,50°, and 65°. The fixed design consisted of a 28/56mm inner diameter/outer diameter acetabular hip insert that articulated against a 28mm CoCr femoral head (n=6). The mobile design consisted of a 28mm CoCr femoral head into a 28/56mm inner diameter/outer diameter polyethylene insert that articulates against a 48mm metal shell (n=6). The study was conducted dynamically following a physiologically relevant frictional model8.

A statistical difference was found only between the anatomical angles comparison of 0vs65 degrees in the mobile bearing design. In the fixed bearing design, a statistical difference was found between the anatomical angles comparison of 20vs35 degrees, 20vs50 degrees, and 35vs65 degrees. No anatomical angle effect on frictional torque between each respective angle or bearing design was identified. Frictional torque was found to decrease as a function of anatomical angle for the fixed bearing design (R2=0.7347), while no difference on frictional torque as a function of anatomical angle was identified for the mobile bearing design. (R2=0.0095)

These results indicate that frictional torque for a 28mm femoral head is not affected by either anatomical angle or bearing design. This data suggests that mobile design, while similar to the 28mm fixed bearing, may provide lower frictional torque when compared to larger fixed bearings >or= 32mm8. Previous work by some of the authors [8] show that frictional torque increases as a function of femoral head size. Therefore, this option may afford surgeons the ability to achieve optimal hip range of motion and stability, while avoiding the reported complications associated with using larger fixed bearing heads8. It is important to understand that frictional behavior in hip bearings may be highly sensitive to many factors such as bearing clearance, polyethylene thickness/stiffness, polyethylene thickness/design, and host related factors, which may outweigh the effect of bearing design or cup abduction angle. These factors were not considered in this study.