The aim of this study was to compare the design of the generic
OptiStem XTR femoral stem with the established Exeter femoral stem. We obtained five boxed, as manufactured, implants of both designs
at random (ten in total). Two examiners were blinded to the implant
design and independently measured the mass, volume, trunnion surface
topography, trunnion roughness, trunnion cone angle, Caput-Collum-Diaphyseal
(CCD) angle, femoral offset, stem length, neck length, and the width
and roughness of the polished stem shaft using peer-reviewed methods.
We then compared the stems using these parameters.Aims
Materials and Methods
Surgical simulation and ‘virtual’ surgical tools are becoming recognised as essential aids for speciality training in Trauma & Orthopaedics, as evidenced by the BOA T&O Simulation Curriculum 20131,2. The current generation of hip arthroplasty simulators, including cadaveric workshops, offers the trainee limited exposure to reproducible real life bony pathology. We developed and implemented a novel training course using pathological dry bone models generated from real patient cases to support senior orthopaedic trainees and new consultants in developing knowledge and hands on skills in complex total hip arthroplasty. A two-day programme for 20 delegates was held at a specialist centre for hip arthroplasty. Three complex femoral and three complex acetabular cases were identified from patients seen at our centre. 3D models were printed from CT scans and dry bone models produced (using a mold-casting process), enabling each delegate to have a copy of each case at a cost of around £30 per case per delegate (Figure 1). The faculty was led by 4 senior Consultant revision hip surgeons. A computerised digitising arm was used to measure cup positioning and femoral stem version giving candidates immediate objective feedback (Figure 2). Candidate experience and satisfaction with the course and models was evaluated with a standardised post-course questionnaire.Introduction
Patient/Materials & Methods
