The primary aim of this study was to assess whether pain in the contralateral knee had a clinically significant influence on the outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) according to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score. Secondary aims were to: describe the prevalence of contralateral knee pain; identify if it clinically improves after TKA; and assess whether contralateral knee pain independently influences patient satisfaction with their TKA. A retrospective cohort of 3,178 primary TKA patients were identified from an arthroplasty database. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, and WOMAC scores were collected preoperatively and one year postoperatively for the index knee. In addition, WOMAC pain scores were also collected for the contralateral knee. Overall patient satisfaction was assessed at one year. Preoperative contralateral knee pain was defined according to the WOMAC score: minimal (> 78 points), mild (59 to 78), moderate (44 to 58), and severe (< 44). Multivariate regression analysis was used to adjust for confounding.Aims
Methods
The primary aim of this study was to assess the rate of patient
satisfaction one year after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) according
to the focus of the question asked. The secondary aims were to identify
independent predictors of patient satisfaction according to the
focus of the question. A retrospective cohort of 2521 patients undergoing a primary
unilateral TKA were identified from an established regional arthroplasty
database. Patient demographics, comorbidities, Western Ontario and
McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and 12-Item Short-Form
Health Survey (SF-12) scores were collected preoperatively and one
year postoperatively. Patient satisfaction was assessed using four
questions, which focused on overall outcome, activity, work, and
pain. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent
preoperative predictors of increased stiffness when adjusting for
confounding variables.Aims
Patients and Methods
The primary aim of this study was to assess whether patient satisfaction
one year after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) changed with longer
follow-up. The secondary aims were to identify predictors of satisfaction
at one year, persistence of patient dissatisfaction, and late onset
dissatisfaction in patients that were originally satisfied at one year. A retrospective cohort consisting of 1369 patients undergoing
a primary TKA for osteoarthritis that had not undergone revision
were identified from an established arthroplasty database. Patient
demographics, comorbidities, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities
Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores, and Short Form 12 (SF-12) questionnaire
scores were collected preoperatively, and one and five years postoperatively.
In addition, patient satisfaction was assessed at one and five years
postoperatively. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify
independent predictors of satisfaction at one and five years.Aims
Patients and Methods
We wished to quantify the influence of constraint and various principal indications upon functional outcome following aseptic first time revision knee arthroplasty. In this single centre, prospective study we have looked into the outcome of 175 total revision knee replacement performed between 2003 and 2008 at a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Data was refined to allow for examination exclusively of those cases where the level of constraint was increased from cruciate retaining or cruciate sacrificing knee replacement to either non linked constrained implant (condylar constrained) or linked constrained (rotating hinge) prosthesis.Introduction
Methods
We describe a cohort of patients with a high rate of mid-term failure following Kinemax Plus total knee replacement inserted between 1998 and 2001. This implant has been recorded as having a survival rate of 96% at ten years. However, in our series the survival rate was 75% at nine years. This was also significantly lower than that of subsequent consecutive series of PFC Sigma knee replacements performed by the same surgeon. No differences were found in the clinical and radiological parameters between the two groups. At revision the most striking finding was polyethylene wear. An independent analysis of the polyethylene components was therefore undertaken. Scanning electron microscopy revealed type 2 fusion defects in the ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE), which indicated incomplete boundary fusion. Other abnormalities consistent with weak UHMWPE particle interface strength were present in both the explanted inserts and in unused inserts from the same period. We consider that these type 2 fusion defects are the cause of the early failure of the Kinemax implants. This may represent a manufacturing defect resulting in a form of programmed polyethylene failure.
