Although established serum inflammatory biomarkers, such as serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum white blood cell count (WBC), showed low accuracies in the literature, they are still commonly used in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). For a sufficient preoperative diagnosis novel more accurate serum parameters are needed. The aim of our study was to evaluate the performances of the established and novel routinely available serum parameters in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections when using the proposed European Bone and Joint Infection Society (pEBJIS) criteria. In this retrospective study, 177 patients with an indicated revision surgery after a total joint replacement were included from 2015 to 2019. The easily accessible and routinely available serum parameters CRP, WBC, the percentage of neutrophils (%N), the neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio (NLR), fibrinogen and the platelet count to mean platelet volume ratio (PC/mPV) were evaluated preoperatively. The performances were examined via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (AUC). The curves were compared using the z-test. Seventy-five cases (42%) showed a PJI based on the pEBJIS-criteria.Aim
Method
This study aimed to assess the performance of an automated multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR) technique for rapid diagnosis of native joint septic arthritis Consecutive patients with suspected septic arthritis undergoing aseptic diagnostic joint aspiration were included. The aspirate was used for analysis by mPCR and conventional microbiological analysis. A joint was classed as septic according to modified Newman criteria. Based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) values of the mPCR and the synovial fluid culture were compared using the z-test. A total of 72 out of 76 consecutive patients (33 women, 39 men; mean age 64 years (22 to 92)) with suspected septic arthritis were included in this study.Aims
Patients and Methods
Periprosthetic joint infections are a devastating complication after modular endoprosthetic reconstruction following resection of a musculoskeletal tumour. Due to long operating times, soft tissue dissection and immunosuppression, the infection rate after limb salvage is high and ranges between 8% and 15%. The aim of this retrospective single centre study was to assess the reinfection and re-reinfection rate after septic complications of megaprostheses. In this retrospective study, 627 patients with a primary replacement of a musculoskeletal tumour of the lower limb and reconstruction by a megaprosthesis were recorded from 1983 – 2016. 83 out of 621 patients available for follow-up experienced an infection (13.4%). Two patients were treated with debridement and removal of the mobile parts, 61 patients with a one-stage revision, 16 patients with a two-stage revision, and 4 patients with an amputation. The mean follow up was 133 months (range: 2 – 423 months).Aim
Method
Aim of the study was to find out whether patients with positive minor criteria but without meeting the MSIS definition have a difference in the outcome after revision-surgery compared to patients without any MSIS-criteria? And does the reason for revision-surgery (eg. loosening) have an additional influence on the outcome parameters in patients with positive minor criteria? A retrospective matched-pair analysis with 98 patients who had undergone revision-surgery after TJA was performed. Forty-nine patients who showed 1 to 3 positive minor criteria (PMC) whereas 49 patients without any positive minor criteria (aseptic complications control group) were compared regarding re-revision-rate and revision-free survival. Patients were matched regarding sex, age, joint and comorbidities using the classification system by McPherson et al. Reasons for revisions were categorized in loosening, body wear, periprosthetic fracture/mechanical failure and soft-tissue complication. Endpoints were defined as re-revision for any cases.Aim
Method
Quantitative assessment of alpha-Defensin offers a promising approach for diagnosing a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) with sensitivities and specificities ranging from 97% to 100% and 95% to 100%, respectively. However, to the best of our knowledge and after due inquiry little information exists concerning qualitative measurements of alpha-Defensin. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the alpha-Defensin test, a lateral flow test for the qualitative detection of alpha-Defensin. In this study, 50 patient with indicated revision surgery met the inclusion criteria due to septic or aseptic loosening. In addition to clinical standard diagnostics of PJI, the alpha-Defensin testAim
Method
Septic arthritis is a therapeutic emergency with a high mortality rate (about 11%)(1). Inadequate treatment can cause permanent joint damage. Management of the septic arthritis includes prompt antibiotic treatment as well as joint-decompression and removal of purulent material(2). It is still discussed controversially and there is little evidence which surgical concept is preferable: arthroscopy with lavage and debridement or open arthrotomy with synovectomy(3,4). The aim of the study was to compare efficacy of arthroscopy and arthrotomy in patients with septic gonarthritis. We evaluated 70 consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopy or arthrotomy at our clinic, because of a bacterial monarthritis of the knee between 2002 and 2010. Our primary outcome was the early recurrence of infection (> 3 months after surgery), which made a second surgery necessary. We compared patients who suffered reinfection and those who did not, in regard to the surgery type as well as potential confounders like comorbidity (measured by Charlson comorbidity index), age, body mass index (BMI), Gächter's -, Kellgren and Lawrence - and Outerbridge classification, duration of symptoms and inflammatory parameters. Furthermore we evaluated differences of the confounders between the surgery groups. From the 70 patients 41 were treated arthroscopic and 29 with arthrotomy. In total eight patients (11.4%) had to undergo a second surgery because of early reinfection. The rate was significantly higher in patients treated with arthrotomy (n=6; 20.7%) compared to those treated with arthroscopy (n=2; 4.9%) (p=0.041). Whereas we found no significant influence of potential confounders between the reinfection group and the group where primary eradication was achieved. Patients who underwent arthrotomy were significantly older, had more comorbidities (both p<0.001) and higher grades of osteoarthritis according to Kellgren and Lawrence classification (p=0.023). In order to adjust the study population towards confounders we performed a subgroup analysis on patients of the second and third age percentile. When we repeated our analysis we still found a significant higher reinfection rate in the arthrotomy group (p=0.036). At the same time there were no differences in prevalence of confounders, neither between the two surgery groups, nor between the reinfection and the primary eradication group. Patients with bacterial monarthritis of the knee who were treated with arthroscopy had a significantly lower reinfection rate than those treated with arthrotomy. As arthroscopy is the less invasive and more sufficient method it should be considered the routine treatment according to our data.
