Hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) has seen a recent revival with third generation Metal-on-Metal prostheses and is now widely in use. However, safety and effectiveness of hip resurfacing are still questioned. We systematically reviewed peer-reviewed literature on hip resurfacing arthroplasty to address these issues. To evaluate implant survival and functional outcomes of hybrid Metal-on-Metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA).Background
Objective
Cementless Total Hip Replacement surgery is a well established procedure for relative young patients with severe hip disease. Excellent long term clinical results have been published on the performance of the femoral component. With growing clinical experience, our concern focused on excessive wear of the Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) ringloc liner of the Mallory Head cementless Total Hip Prosthesis. After its introduction in our clinic in 1997, this implant is still in use without any modification. We were concerned that due to premature liner wear, the performance of this implant would not be compliant with the international guideline on implant survival (NICE guidelines: at 10 year follow up, 90% of all implants should still be in situ). Our objective was to establish the amount of liner wear in our first 200 MH implants. Our first 200 patients consecutively treated with Mallory Head prostheses were followed up to obtain a recent digital image. Follow up was complete for 181 (90.5%) of our 200 patients. Ten had died and nine were not able or willing to come for follow up. The mean duration of follow up was 8.3 years (range: 8–13). The 181 recent digital images were classified as either excessive wear or no excessive wear by two independent orthopedic surgeons. Next, liner wear was measured in the 2D frontal plane using PolyWare Pro/3D Digital Version Rev 5.1 software (Draftware Developers, Conway, USA). A threshold for excessive liner wear was set at 0.2mm/year, according to literature.INTRODUCTION
METHODS
