Sub-acromial decompression surgery (SAD) has been widely used to treat shoulder impingement. Its validity has been questioned in multi-centric clinical trials and dissatisfaction rates can be high (35%). It is difficult to predict which patients will benefit operatively as research into predictive factors is limited. The study aim was to conduct a root-cause analysis of reasons for dissatisfaction in a cohort of operated patients.

All patients with SAD dissatisfaction in the local Upper Limb database between 2015-19 (n=74/296) formed our study cohort. Patients were scored on Oxford shoulder score (OSS), QuickDASH score, EQ-5D-3L (TTO+VAS) at weeks 26 and 52 post-operatively. Patients' clinical history, radiographs, consultation and operative notes were reviewed.

28% of patients were dissatisfied with surgery. Mean age =52.3±13.4 years with equal gender distribution. 87% were operated arthroscopically. 67% were in physically demanding occupations. There was a significant increase in OSS and QuickDASH at weeks 26 and 52 post-operatively (p<0.05), similar improvement was not noted in VAS pain score. Pain followed by stiffness were the main contributors of dissatisfaction. Multiple implicating factors were noted, the most common being acromio-clavicular joint arthritis (25.7%), suggesting concomitant pathologies as an additional cause for patient dissatisfaction.

This is the first study to evaluate reasons for dissatisfaction following SAD. We noted high rates (28%) of dissatisfaction and a predilection for those involved in physically demanding occupations. We recommend meticulous pre-operative workup to identify co-existing pathologies and appropriate pre-operative counselling to improve outcomes in selected patients needing SAD following failure of conservative management.

The COVID-19 pandemic presented a significant impact on orthopaedic surgical operating. This multi-centre study aimed to ascertain what factors contributed to delays to theatre in patients with shoulder and elbow trauma.

A retrospective cohort study of 621 upper limb (shoulder and elbow) trauma patients between 16/03/2020 and 16/09/2021 (18-months) was extracted from trauma lists in NHS Tayside, Highland and Grampian and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS).

Median patient age =51 years (range 2-98), 298 (48%) were male and 323 (52%) female. The commonest operation was olecranon open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) 106/621 cases (17.1%), followed by distal humerus ORIF − 63/621 (10.1%). Median time to surgery was 2 days (range 0-263). 281/621 (45.2%) of patients underwent surgical intervention within 0-1 days and 555/621 patients (89.9%) had an operation within 14 days of sustaining their injury. 66/621 (10.6%) patients waited >14 days for surgery. There were 325/621 (52.3%) patients with documented evidence of delay to surgery; of these 55.6% (181/325) were due to amendable causes. 66/325 (20.3%) of these patients suffered complications; the most common being post-operative stiffness in 48.6% of cases (n=32/66).

To our knowledge, this is the first study to specifically explore effect of COVID-19 pandemic on upper limb trauma patients. We suggest delays to theatre may have contributed to higher rates of post-operative stiffness and require more physiotherapy during the rehabilitation phase. In future pandemic planning, we propose dedicated upper-limb trauma lists to prevent delays to theatre and optimise patients’ post-operative outcomes.

Mirels’ score predicts the likelihood of sustaining pathological fractures using pain, lesion site, size and morphology. The aim is to investigate its reproducibility, reliability and accuracy in upper limb bony metastases and validate its use in pathological fracture prediction.

A retrospective cohort study of patients with upper limb metastases, referred to an Orthopaedic Trauma Centre (2013–18). Mirels’ was calculated in 32 patients; plain radiographs at presentation scored by 6 raters. Radiological aspects were scored twice by each rater, 2-weeks apart. Inter- and intra-observer reliability were calculated (Fleiss’ kappa test). Bland-Altman plots compared variances of individual score components &total Mirels’ score.

Mirels’ score of ≥9 did not accurately predict lesions that would fracture (11% 5/46 vs 65.2% Mirels’ score ≤8, p<0.0001). Sensitivity was 14.3% &specificity was 72.7%. When Mirels’ cut-off was lowered to ≥7, patients were more likely to fracture (48% 22/46 versus 28% 13/46, p=0.045). Sensitivity rose to 62.9%, specificity fell to 54.6%. Kappa values for interobserver variability were 0.358 (fair, 0.288–0.429) for lesion size, 0.107 (poor, 0.02–0.193) for radiological appearance and 0.274 (fair, 0.229–0.318) for total Mirels’ score. Values for intraobserver variability were 0.716 (good, 95% CI 0.432–0.999) for lesion size, 0.427 (moderate, 95% CI 0.195–0.768) for radiological appearance and 0.580 (moderate, 0.395–0.765) for total Mirels’ score.

We showed moderate to substantial agreement between &within raters using Mirels’ score on upper limb radiographs. Mirels’ has poor sensitivity &specificity predicting upper limb fractures - we recommend the cut-off score for prophylactic surgery should be lower than for lower limb lesions.