Between 1980 and 2000, 63 support rings were used in the management of acetabular deficiency in a series of 60 patients, with a mean follow-up of 8.75 years (2 months to 23.8 years). There was a minimum five-year follow-up for successful reconstructions. The indication for revision surgery was aseptic loosening in 30 cases and infection in 33. All cases were Paprosky III defects; IIIA in 33 patients (52.4%) and IIIB in 30 (47.6%), including four with pelvic dissociation. A total of 26 patients (43.3%) have died since surgery, and 34 (56.7%) remain under clinical review. With acetabular revision for infection or aseptic loosening as the definition of failure, we report success in 53 (84%) of the reconstructions. A total of 12 failures (19%) required further surgery, four (6.3%) for aseptic loosening of the acetabular construct, six (9.5%) for recurrent infection and two (3.2%) for recurrent dislocation requiring captive components. Complications, seen in 11 patients (18.3%), included six femoral or sciatic neuropraxias which all resolved, one grade III heterotopic ossification, one on-table acetabular revision for instability, and three early post-operative dislocations managed by manipulation under anaesthesia, with no further instability.

We recommend support rings and morcellised bone graft for significant acetabular bone deficiency that cannot be reconstructed using mesh.

Aims and Objectives Hybrid hip replacement became popular in some centres for younger patients with expected lower rates of acetabular loosening and subsequent revision. We have previously reported our 5 year results and now have further follow-up data on the same cohort of patients.

Materials and Methods 86 uncemented acetabular components of the same design were implanted into 68 patients between 1992 and 1997 who were prospectively followed with respect to clinical outcome, polyethylene wear and intention to revise as a definition of failure.

Results Data is available on 73 acetabular cups with a mean follow-up of 9.5 years. The failure rate is 22%. 9 patients have been revised and 7 further patients await revision for polyethylene wear and osteolysis which in some cases has been very aggressive. Further patients have advanced wear and early lysis which is under close observation.

Conclusion The prosthesis studied has a high failure rate. Patients often report few symptoms until advanced osteolysis has occurred. We recommend that all patients with this type of prosthesis be recalled for frequent radiological review and report on an implant which seems to be failing unacceptably early.

The use of prolonged courses of parenteral or oral antibiotic therapy in the management of two stage revision of infected total knee arthroplasty is reported by all major series.

We present a series of 59 consecutive patients, all with microbiologically proven deep infection managed at our unit where a prolonged course of antibiotic therapy has not been routinely used. The mean follow-up is 56.4 months (range 24–114 months). Of the 38 patients undergoing a staged exchange, infection was successfully eradicated in 34 patients (89%) with recurrent or persistent infection in 4 (11%). The infection cure rate in our series is similar that reported elsewhere.

A prolonged course of antibiotic therapy does not seem to alter the incidence of recurrent or persistent infection. The costs of antibiotic administration are high, both to the patient and care facility. It may be unnecessary.

A reduced femoral offset in total hip replacement has been thought to be disadvantageous. We reviewed the results of 54 consecutive primary total hip replacements in 49 patients (mean age of 68 years) performed between August 1990 and December 1994, with a mean follow-up of 8.8 years (sd 2.1). The mean pre-operative femoral offset for these hips was 41 mm (sd 7.4). All patients received a low-offset Charnley stem and a polyethylene cup inserted by a single surgeon.

At their latest follow-up, surviving patients had a significant improvement in the performance of their hip. Three had undergone revision, one each for deep infection, recurrent dislocation and late pain with subluxation. No hips had been revised, or were at risk of revision, for aseptic loosening. The mean annual linear rate of wear was 0.2 mm (sd 0.08) for the whole group. There was no correlation between the pre-operative femoral offset and the post-operative rate of wear. Our survivorship estimate was 91% when revision for any reason was taken as an end-point, but 100% if aseptic loosening was considered as the end-point. Our study demonstrates that a low-offset femoral stem can produce good, medium-term results.

All major studies have incorporated the use of prolonged courses of parenteral or oral antibiotic therapy in the management of two-stage revision of an infected total knee arthroplasty. We present a series of 59 consecutive patients, all with microbiologically-proven deep infection of a total knee arthroplasty, in whom a prolonged course of antibiotic therapy was not routinely used. The mean follow-up was 56.4 months (24 to 114).

Of the 38 patients who underwent a staged exchange, infection was successfully eradicated in 34 (89%) but recurrent or persistent infection was present in four (11%). Our rate of cure for infection is similar to that reported elsewhere. We conclude that a prolonged course of antibiotic therapy seems not to alter the incidence of recurrent or persistent infection. The costs of the administration of antibiotics are high and such a regime may be unnecessary.