Previous studies of EMG recordings from lumbar para-spinal muscles have shown correlations between some EMG variables and low back pain. However there are discrepancies in the literature concerning the usefulness of some of these variables. It has been suggested that ordinary fatigue influences the reproducibility of these measurements, introducing a confounding factor. In this study we have investigated changes in EMG variables, following a day of normal activity. Forty six subjects participated in this study. EMG recordings were performed at the beginning of their shift (time 1) and at 6 h 20 ±5 min afterwards (time 2) under isometric condition at 60% and 40% of their lean body mass (LBM). Variables studied were initial medial frequency (IMF), median frequency slope (MFS) and half width (HW). At 60% LBM, IMF measurements at time 1 and time 2 were highly correlated (r2= 0.84, p>
0001) and this was the case for HW measurements (r2=0.84, p>
0001) and MF slope (r2=0.52, p=0>
001). Conducting paired sample t-test also showed no significant change in the IMF from time 1 (M=48.6, SD=8.9) to time 2 (M=49.2, SD=7.3), t(45)=−0.9, p=0.38, or in HW from time 1 (M=47.2, SD=15.5) to time 2 (M=45.9, SD=13.9), t(45)=1.7, p=0.29, or MF slope from time 1 (M=−0.2, SD=0.17) to time 2 (M=−0.24, SD=0.16), t(45)=1.67, p=0.10). The relations observed at 40% LBM almost mirrored those reported at 60 % LBM but with even less significant difference from time1 to time2. We conclude that IMF, HW and MFS are highly reproducible EMG variables that are not affected by ordinary fatigue and may therefore be valuable in examining differences between subjects or over longer time periods. However they are not useful in assessing changes due to daily exertion.
No correlation between within individual change in load and presence or absence of LFP was found. Only one subject showed a significant correlation between individual change in load with the magnitude of LFPs (r=−0.75, p=0.012). However, when the cumulative data from all 19 subjects was analysed, small correlation between the change in load and magnitude of LFPs (r=−0.17, n=187, p=0.022) was observed, with greater load associated with smaller LFP. No other correlation between gender, individuals load, age and fitness was found.
at the same load and at 2/3 of their current Maximum Voluntary Contraction (MVC).