Introduction and Objective

Intramedullary nails are frequently used for treatment of unstable distal tibia fractures. However, insufficient fixation of the distal fragment could result in delayed healing, malunion or nonunion. The quality of fixation may be adversely affected by the design of both the nail and locking screws, as well as by the fracture pattern and bone density. Recently, a novel concept for angular stable nailing has been developed that maintains the principle of relative stability and introduces improvements expected to reduce nail toggling, screw migration and secondary loss of reduction. It incorporates polyether ether ketone (PEEK) inlays integrated in the distal and proximal canal portions of the nail for angular stable screw locking. The nail can be used with new standard locking screws and low-profile retaining locking screws, both designed to enhance cortical fixation. The low-profile screws are with threaded head, anchoring in the bone and increasing the surface contact area due to the head's increased diameter.

The objective of this study was to investigate the biomechanical competence of the novel angular stable intramedullary nail concept for treatment of unstable distal tibia fractures, compared with four other nail designs in an artificial bone model under dynamic loading.

Unstable distal tibia fractures are challenging injuries requiring surgical treatment. Intramedullary nails are frequently used; however, distal fragment fixation problems may arise, leading to delayed healing, malunion or nonunion. Recently, a novel angle-stable locking nail design has been developed that maintains the principle of relative construct stability, but introduces improvements expected to reduce nail toggling, screw migration and secondary loss of reduction, without the requirement for additional intraoperative procedures.

The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical competence of a novel angle-stable intramedullary nail concept for treatment of unstable distal tibia fractures, compared to a conventional nail in a human cadaveric model under dynamic loading.

Ten pairs of fresh-frozen human cadaveric tibiae with a simulated AO/OTA 42-A3.1 fracture were assigned to 2 groups for reamed intramedullary nailing using either a conventional (non-angle-stable) Expert Tibia Nail with 3 distal screws (Group 1) or the novel Tibia Nail Advanced system with 2 distal angle-stable locking low-profile screws (Group 2). The specimens were biomechanically tested under conditions including quasi-static and progressively increasing combined cyclic axial and torsional loading in internal rotation until failure of the bone-implant construct, with monitoring by means of motion tracking.

Initial axial construct stiffness, although being higher in Group 2, did not significantly differ between the 2 nail systems, p=0.29. In contrast, initial torsional construct stiffness was significantly higher in Group 2 compared to Group 1, p=0.04. Initial nail toggling of the distal tibia fragment in varus and flexion was lower in Group 2 compared to Group 1, being significant in flexion, p=0.91 and p=0.03, respectively. After 5000 cycles, interfragmentary movements in terms of varus, flexion, internal rotation, axial displacement and shear displacement at the fracture site were all lower in Group 2 compared to Group 1, with flexion and shear displacement being significant, p=0.14, p=0.04, p=0.25, p=0.11 and p=0.04, respectively. Cycles to failure until both interfragmentary 5° varus and 5° flexion were significantly higher in Group 2 compared to Group 1, p=0.04.

From a biomechanical perspective, the novel angle-stable intramedullary nail concept has the potential of achieving a higher initial axial and torsional relative stability and maintaining it with a better resistance towards loss of reduction under dynamic loading, while reducing the number of distal locking screws, compared to conventional locking in intramedullary nailed unstable distal tibia fractures.

Introduction: Radial Head Arthroplasty is considered the treatment of choice for unreconstructable radial head fractures. Short-term results in the current literatue are promising. Due to the lack of long-term results, radial head arthroplasty is looked at critically by many surgeons. In our the study we provide the 8.4 years results after treatment with the floating radial head prosthesis by Judet (Tornier, France).

Methods: In our department 19 patients were treated with bipolar radial head arthroplasty between 1997 and 2001. 11 prostheses were implantated primary and 6 secondary. The other two were implanted because of a loosening of a prior implanted prosthesis and one after resection of a vast chondrosarcoma. 12 of these patients − 10 men and 2 women – were now examined retrospectively after 101 months (78–132).

Results: 6 Patients were treated primary, 5 secondary and one was treated because of a vast chondrosarcoma. There were 5 proximal ulna fractures and 8 processus coronoideus fractures as concomitant injuries of the elbow. Following complications were seen: 2 dislocations, 2 capitellar erosions and 4 cases of heterotopic ossifications. According to the Mayo Elbow Performance Score 4 patients achieved an excellent result, 7 a good, and one a satisfactory result. The mean DASH was 13.7 (0–44). No differences were seen between primary and secondary implantation. The flexion arc was 123° (110–140°), the extension deficit was 20° (0–40°), pronation 61° (30–90°) and supination 62° (40–90°).

Conclusion: Our 8.4 years results show that radial head arthroplasty with Judet’s bipolar prosthesis leads to mostly excellent and good – subjective as well as objective – results.