Biomechanical joint contact pressure distribution measurements have proven to be a very valuable tool in orthopaedic research to investigate the influence of surgical techniques such as total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on the human knee joint. Quantification of the in vitro tibiofemoral and patellofemoral contact pressure distribution before and after the intervention are an important measure to evaluate the impact of the surgery. The K scan pressure sensor from Tekscan (South Boston USA) is a commonly reported device for these in vitro pressure measurements. Despite the large interest in the sensor, the effective measurement accuracy for in vitro biomechanical joint contact measurement still remains a big question and therefore the reliability of these measurements should be questioned. Reliable contact pressure measurements can only be done if the sensor behaviour is fully understood. Therefore, a tailored multi-axial testing machine has been designed to profoundly investigate and characterise the sensor behaviour. This test setup is unique through its ability to apply a predefined tangential force or sliding velocity to the sensor's interface next to a normal force. Dynamic effects occurring in knee joint motion can thus be simulated while evaluating the effect on the contact pressure measurements.Background
Methods
In-vitro testing of knee joints remains vital in the understanding of knee surgery and arthroplasty. However, based on the design philosophy of the original Oxford knee simulator, this in-vitro testing has mainly focused on squatting motion. As the activities of daily living might drastically differ from this type of motion, both from a kinematic and kinetic point of view, a new knee simulator is required that allows studying more random motion patterns. This paper describes a novel knee simulator that overcomes the limitations of traditional Oxford simulators, providing both kinematic and kinetic freedom with respect to the applied boundary conditions. This novel test simulator keeps the hip at a fixed position, only providing a single rotational degree of freedom (DOF) in the sagittal plane. In addition, the ankle holds four DOF, including all rotational DOF and the translation along the medio-lateral axis. Combining these boundary conditions leaves five independent DOF to the knee; the knee flexion angle is actively controlled through the positioning of the ankle joint in the antero-posterior and proximal-distal direction. The specimens' quadriceps muscle is actively controlled, the medial and lateral hamstrings are passively loaded. To validate the performance of this simulator, two fresh frozen specimens have been tested during normal squatting and cycling. Their kinematic patterns have been compared to relevant literature data.Background
Methods
