Anterior only procedure for stable thoraco-lumbar burst fractures is controversial.

Prospective collection of clinical and radiological data in stable burst fractures with neurological deficit undergoing anterior only decompression and stabilisation with 2-year follow-up.

14 consecutive patients (8 females, 6 males) with two-column thoracolumbar burst fracture and neurological deficit underwent anterior corpectomy/hemi-corpectomy and instrumentation, from February 2007 to February 2009.

Radiological data included classification of fracture (AO classification), kyphus angle and degree of canal compromise. Post-operative CT scans done to assess radiological improvement.

Clinical data included neurological deficit at presentation, improvement or changes in neurology, length of surgery, estimated blood loss, post-operative complications and length of stay.

Commonest mechanism was fall from height. 10 patients had incomplete burst fractures amenable to hemi-corpectomy. 8 of our patients were ASIA D, 4 were ASIA C or lower. They all improved by at least one grade. 2 patients had identical ASIA grade pre and post operatively. Pre-operative spinal canal compromise averaged 52.6% and vertebral body height loss averaged 48.9%. The mean kyphotic angles improved from 19.6° to 7.9 °. There were two cases with minor injury to the diaphragm, one developing a pneumothorax. Mean length of surgery and hospital stay were 4hours and 21minutes and 11.8 days respectively.

The fractures in which the top part is burst and causing canal compromise, could be dealt with by top hemi-corpectomy requiring smaller approach. One stage anterior – only stabilization can yield successful clinical results.

Patient outcomes using the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) questionnaire after thoracoscopic and posterior surgical techniques for thoracic idiopathic scoliosis were compared after > 2 years post-op. Additional comparisons were made with non-operated scoliosis and normal patients. Our objective was to determine if scoliosis surgery and surgical technique used to treat a cohort of patients with the same type of scoliosis deformity affects patient outcome. The SRS-24 questionnaire was prospectively administered to 4 groups of patients:

42 patients with thoracic idiopathic scoliosis who underwent thoracoscopic instrumented fusion surgery (thoracoscopic group);

The 2 surgical groups were comparable with regards to age at surgery, pre-op Cobbo and follow-up. SRS-24 domian scores were computed for all 4 groups and were compared on SPSSv13 software. Our results show the thoracoscopic group having a significantly smaller mean post-op Cobbo (17° vs 25.1°, respectively; p< .001), which was achieved using less fusion segments (7 vs 9.3 segments, respectively; p< .001). The mean Cobbo of the scoliosis control group was significantly larger than the post-op Cobbo of the thoracoscopic group (p< .001), and was comparable to the post-op Cobbo of the posterior group. Comparing the 2 surgical groups, the thoracoscopic group showed trends towards better scores in 4 of the SRS-24 domains compared to the posterior group, but this only reached statistical significance for the satisfaction domain (p< .05). When comparing the 4 groups, Pain scores of both surgical groups were similar to those who did not have surgery, and were worse than normal patients (p< .0001); Self-image scores after surgery were higher than those who did not have surgery(p< .05) and were comparable to normal patients; Function and Activity scores of the thoracoscopic group was significantly inferior to the scoliosis control group (p< .05). Our study demonstrates that > 2 years after surgery, both thoracoscopic & posterior surgery resulted in pain scores that were similar to patients with scoliosis that did not have surgery, and were worse than the normal group. However, both surgical techniques resulted in self-image scores that are comparable to normal individuals despite a difference in post-op Cobbo. When comparing the two surgical techniques, the SRS-24 showed no difference between the 2 surgical techniques, except for patient satisfaction which was better in the thoracoscopic group.

Anterior instrumentation is an established method of correcting King I adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Posterior segmental pedicle screw instrumentation, with its more powerful corrective force over hooks, could offer significant advantages. The purpose of our study is to compare the results of anterior instrumentation versus segmental pedicle screw instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic thoracolumbar scoliosis. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 36 consecutive female patients with adolescent idiopathic thoracolumbar scoliosis who had surgery from December 1997. All had a minimum of two year follow-up. Eleven patients had posterior surgery performed on them.

Mean age at surgery was similar between both groups. Length of surgery was significantly shorter in the posterior group (189 minutes versus 272 minutes). Length of hospital stay was shorter in the posterior group (6.2 days versus eight days). Estimated blood loss, duration of analgesia, and ICU stay did not differ significantly between the two groups. No complications were encountered in both groups at latest follow-up. The magnitudes and flexibility of the thoracolumbar curves did not differ significantly between the two groups. The number of levels in the major curve was also similar between the groups. Fusion levels were shorter in the anterior group (mean 4.1 versus 5.0). The percentage correction of scoliosis was similar between the two groups at all stages of follow-up, being 74% at one week post-surgery, 70% at six months post-surgery, 68% at one year post-surgery and latest follow-up in the anterior group; and 71% at one week post-surgery, 67% at six months post-surgery, 68% at one year post-surgery, and 67% at latest follow-up in the posterior group.

Thoracolumbar sagittal alignment at T11 to L2 was maintained for both groups throughout the follow-up period. The incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis was higher in the posterior group (p < 0.01).

In conclusion, surgical correction of both the frontal and sagittal plane deformity are comparable to anterior instrumentation. Shorter length of surgery and hospital stay are the potential benefits of posterior surgery. Posterior segmental pedicle screw instrumentation offers significant advantage, and is a viable alternative to standard anterior instrumentation in idiopathic thoracolumbar scoliosis.

Thoracoscopic spinal instrumentation and fusion has emerged as a viable alternative to open anterior and posterior techniques for the treatment of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Furthermore, the morbidity associated with thoracoscopy is limited, and the cosmetic result more desirable because of the minimal skin and chest wall dissection required with this method. However, the technique is technically demanding and has been perceived as having a steep learning curve. The objective of our study is to anal the initial series of 50 patients performed by a single surgeon, with respect to the coronal and sagittal alignment on radiographs, as well as a review of the peri-operative data and complications.

Fifty consecutive patients who underwent thoraco-scopic instrumentation and fusion were divided into two groups for the purpose of this study: the first 25 cases (1st group) and the second 25 cases (2nd group). The minimum follow-up of these cases was 12 months (range 12 to 67 months). Data collected included the operative time, intra-operative blood loss, number of levels instrumented, length of the hospital stay, the number of days in the ICU, and the duration of analgesia.

No major complications, such as neurological deficit, vascular injury, or implant failure were observed. No significant difference was encountered between the groups in terms of age and menarche at surgery, pre-operative curve magnitude and flexibility, sagittal profile, as well as the number of levels in the curve pre-operatively. The second group had significantly better coronal deformity correction at one week post-operatively (9.5 degrees versus 16.3 degrees, p < 0.001), six months post-operatively (12.1 degrees versus 18.9 degrees, p < 0.001), and at latest follow-up (15.1 degrees versus 19.5 degrees, p < 0.05). The percentage correction of scoliosis was significantly better in the second group at one week postoperatively (p < 0.001), six months post-operatively (p < 0.001), and at latest follow-up (p = 0.014). The percentage change in thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis after surgery was not significantly different between both groups at various times of follow-up. There was no difference between both groups with regards to the number of levels fused, hospital stay, and duration of parenteral analgesia. Operative time was significantly less in the second group (302 minutes versus 372 minutes, p < 0.001). Estimated blood loss was also less in the second group (170 cc versus 266 cc, p = 0.04). The length of ICU stay was also shorter in the second group (1.8 days versus three days, p = 0.004). From the loess (locally-weighted regression) fit, the learning curve is estimated to be 30 cases with regards to the operative time, ICU duration, and the coronal plane deformity correction.

The learning curve associated with thoracoscopic spinal instrumentation is acceptable. The complication rates remained stable throughout the surgeon’s experience. Thoracoscopic anterior instrumented fusion is a viable surgical alternative to standard posterior fusion and instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis requiring selective thoracic fusion.

Study Design: Compartative cohort study.

Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of conventional posterior instrumented fusion versus thoracoscopic instrumented fusion for the surgical treatment of King Type III adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Methods: The results of 34 consecutive patients with King type 3 scoliosis treated with one of the above techniques were analyzed independantly. Twenty-two patients underwent posterior spinal fusion (PSF) and instrumentation (Moss-Miami). Twelve patients had thoracoscopic fusion (TF) and instrumentation (Eclipse).

Results: Baseline demographics (age at menarche and surgery, pre-operative Cobb angles in coronal and sagittal planes), estimated blood loss at surgery and duration of parenteral analgesia did not differ between the two groups. PSF patients had significantly higher transfusion requirements (p=0.032). Operative time (p = 0.0001), ICU stay (p = 0.005), and hospital stay (p = 0.037) were longer in TF cases. There were no complications in PSF patients. Complications in TF patients included lobar collapse (1 patient) and scapula winging (1 patient). Improvement in scoliosis among PSF patients averaged 75% (1 week), 70% (6 months), and 65% (1 year). In TF patients, mean improvement in scoliosis was 66% (1 week), 62% (6 months), and 62% (1 year). The differences between the two groups in terms of scoliosis improvement were not significant. Curves with apex at T8 or higher had better correction of scoliosis (p = 0.05). The sagittal alignment (thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis) after surgery was similar between the two groups at 1 week, 6 months, and 1 year post-operatively.

Conclusion: The efficacy of thoracoscopic anterior fusion and instrumentation is similar to standard posterior instrumented fusion. The advantages of the thoracoscopic technique are the avoidance of a long posterior midline scar, and lower transfusion requirement. A longer operative time, ICU and hospital stay was attributed to the steep learning curve of this endoscopic technique.