Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 79 - 79
1 Jul 2014
Jauch S Huber G Sellenschloh K Haschke H Grupp T Morlock M
Full Access

Summary

Micromotions between stem and neck adapter depend on prosthesis design and material coupling. Based on the results of this study, the amount of micromotion seems to reflect the risk of fretting-induced fatigue in vivo.

Introduction

Bimodular hip prostheses were developed to allow surgeons an individual reconstruction of the hip joint by varying length, offset and anteversion in the operation theatre. Despite these advantages, the use of these systems led to a high rate of postoperative complications resulting in revision rates of up to 11% ten years after surgical intervention. During daily activities taper connections of modular hip implants are highly stressed regions and contain the potential of micromotions between adjacent components, fretting and corrosion. This might explain why an elevated number of fretting-induced neck fractures occurred in clinics. However, some bi-modular prostheses (e.g. Metha, Aesculap, Ti-Ti) are more often affected by those complications than others (e.g. H-Max M, Limacorporate, Ti-Ti or Metha, Ti-CoCr) implying that the design and the material coupling have an impact on this failure pattern. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to clarify whether clinical successful prostheses offer lower micromotions than those with an elevated number of in vivo fractures.