Mechanical ankle instability is elicited through examination and imaging. A subset of patients however report “functional” instability ie/ instability without objective radiological evidence. Little research compares operative outcomes between these groups. We hypothesised patients with “mechanical instability” were more likely to benefit from operative intervention than those with “functional instability”.

This was a single centre, retrospective case note review of prospectively collected data. Inclusion criteria: over six months of symptoms, failed conservative management, surgical stabilisation between 2016–2018. Data collected: demographics, operative procedure, preoperative and postoperative PROMs.

Nineteen patients were included. All had preoperative MRIs determining ligamentous involvement. Nine had radiological evidence of instability, eight had negative radiographs. Two were excluded due to no intraoperative radiographs.

There was no statistical difference in preoperative MOxFQ scores between the groups (p=0.2039). Preoperative EQ5D-TTO scores were statistically different (mean mechanical 0.58 vs functional 0.26, p=0.0162) but not EQ5D-VAS scores (mean mechanical 77 vs functional 53, p=0.0806).

Mechanical group's preoperative, 26 and 52 week scores respectively: Mean MOxFQ= 57.88, 22.13, 18.5. Mean EQ5D-TTO= 0.58, 0.78, 0.84. EQ5D-VAS= 77, 82, 82.5.

Functional group's preoperative, 26 and 52 week scores respectively: Mean MOxFQ= 71.87, 37.75, 23. Mean EQ5D-TTO 0.26, 0.63, 0.76. EQ5D-VAS 53, 80, 88.

This trend of improvement in PROMs was not reflected in patient satisfaction scores. 75% of respondents in the functional group reported dissatisfaction at 26 weeks versus no dissatisfaction in the mechanical group. We should consider counselling patients accordingly when offering surgery.

Arthritis of the mid-foot is a common presentation to the foot and ankle clinic, resulting from primary (idiopathic), post-traumatic, or inflammatory joint degeneration. Treatment in the initial stages is conservative, with midfoot fusion regarded as the operative treatment of choice; however there is a paucity of comparative and patient reported data regarding outcomes.

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMS), were prospectively collected from October-2015 to March-2018. Diagnoses were confirmed with image guided injection and initial management was conservative. In total, 66 patients were managed conservatively and 40 treated with mid-foot fusion. MOxFQ (Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire) and EQ-5D-3L (Euroqual) PROMS were collected pre-operatively, at 26 weeks and at 52 weeks.

In the operatively managed group, the female:male ratio was 5.7:1, with a mean age of 61 (range 24–80), while in the conservatively managed group, the ratio was 2.1:1 with mean age 63 (range 29–86).

In the surgically managed group, 88.2% of patients reported improvement in symptoms at 26 weeks and 88.9% at 52 weeks. This was greater than the conservatively managed group, in which 40.6% reported improvement at 26 weeks and 33.3% at 52 weeks. Mean MOxFQ improvement in the surgically managed group was +30.7 and +33.9 at 26 and 52 weeks respectively, and in the conservative group, +9.4 and +4.3, at 26 and 52 weeks. Similarly, favourable surgical outcomes were reported across all domains of EQ-5D-3L.

This study has highlighted excellent early outcomes after surgical treatment and may represent promise for those patients for whom conservative management fails.

This study aimed to ascertain whether stabilising only the AITFL is enough to prevent talar shift, and to test a simple, novel technique to reconstruct the AITFL.

Twelve cadavers were used. Talar shift was measured following: 1- no ligaments cut; 2- entire deltoid ligament division; 3- group A (5 specimens) PITFL cut whilst group B (7 specimens) AITFL cut; 4- group A had AITFL divided whilst group B had the PITFL cut. Reconstruction of the AITFL was performed using part of the superior extensor retinaculum as a local flap. Measurement of talar shift was then repeated.

With no ligaments divided, mean talar shift was 0.8mm for group A and 0.7mm for group B. When the deltoid ligament was divided, mean talar shift for group A was 4.8mm compared to 4.7mm in group B (P=1.00). The mean shift in group A after PITFL division was 6.0mm, increasing the talar shift by an average of 1.2mm. In group B after AITFL division mean talar shift was 8.3mm (P=0.06), increasing talar shift by an average of 3.6 mm. After division of the second tibiofibular ligament, mean talar shift in group A measured 10.0mm and in group B was 10.9mm(P=0.29).

Three times more talar shift occurred after the AIFTL was divided compared to the PITFL. Repairing just the PITFL (for example by fixation of the posterior malleolus avulsion fracture) may not adequately prevent talar shift while reconstruction of the AITFL potentially restores ankle stability.

Adequate perpendicular access to the posterolateral talar dome for osteochondral defect repair is difficult to achieve and a number of different surgical approaches have been described. This cadaveric study examined the exposure available from various approaches to help guide pre-operative surgical planning.

Four surgical approaches were performed in a step-wise manner on 9 Thiel-embalmed cadavers; anterolateral approach with arthrotomy, anterolateral approach with anterior talo-fibular ligament (ATFL) release, anterolateral approach with antero-lateral tibial osteotomy, and anterolateral approach with lateral malleolus osteotomy. The furthest distance posteriorly which allowed perpendicular access with a 2mm k-wire to the lateral surface of the talar dome was measured from the anterior aspect of the talar dome.

The mean antero-posterior diameter of the lateral talar domes included in this study was 45.1mm. An anterolateral approach to the ankle with arthrotomy provided a mean exposure of the anterior 1/3rd of the lateral talar dome. ATFL release increased this to 43.2%. A lateral malleolus osteotomy provided superior exposure (81.5% vs 58.8%) compared to an anterolateral tibial osteotomy.

Only the anterior half of the lateral border of the talar dome could be accessed with an anterolateral approach without osteotomy. A fibular osteotomy provided best exposure to the posterolateral aspect of the talar dome and is recommended for lesions affecting the posterior half of the lateral talar dome.

There is debate whether a home run screw (medial cuneiform to 2nd metatarsal base) combined with k-wire fixation of 4th & 5th rays is sufficient to stabilise Lisfrance injuries or if fixation of the 3rd ray is also required. Unlike the 2nd, 4th and 5th TMTJ, stabilisation of the 3rd requires either intra-articular screw or a cross joint plate which both risk causing chondrolysis and/or OA.

Using 8 Theil embalmed specimens, measurements of TMTJ dorsal displacement at each ray (1st to 5th) and 1st – 2nd metatarsal gaping were made during simulated weight bearing with sequential ligamentous injury and stabilisation to determine the contribution of anatomical structures and fixation to stability.

At baseline mean dorsal TMTJ displacement of the intact specimens during simulated weight bearing (mm) was: 1st: 0.14, 2nd: 0.1, 3rd:0, 4th: 0, 5th: 0.14. The 1st-2nd IM Gap was 0mm. After transection of the Lisfranc ligament only, there was 1st-2nd intermetatarsal gaping (mean 4.5mm), but no increased dorsal displacement. After additional transection of all the TMTJ ligaments dorsal displacement increased at all joints (1st: 4.5, 2nd: 5.1, 3rd: 3.6, 4th: 2, 5th: 1.3). Stabilisation with the home run screw and 4th and 5th ray k-wires virtually eliminated all displacement. Further transection of the 3rd/4th inter-metatarsal ligaments increased mean dorsal displacement of the 3rd ray to 2.5mm. K-wire fixation of the 3rd ray completely eliminated dorsal displacement.

The results suggest that stabilising the 2nd and 4/5th TMTJs will stabilise the 3rd if the inter-metatarsal ligaments are intact. Thus 3rd TMTJ stability should be checked after stabilising the 2nd and 4/5th. Provided the intermetatarsal ligaments (3rd-4th) are intact the 3rd ray does not need to be stabilised routinely.

Shoulder arthroplasty is the treatment of choice for a range of degenerative diseases. However, long term follow-up suggests almost half of patients graded their treatment as unsatisfactory. Component malalignment is thought the most likely cause. The anterior anatomical neck is used as a reference for the osteotomy. The objective of the study was to analyse the cartilage/metaphyseal interface to identify reference points that may recover version accurately.

Twenty-four humeri were scanned using a Microscribe digitiser and surface laser scanner. Modelling software was used to analyse the Cartilage/metaphyseal interface. The retroversion angle was calculated for the normal geometry and for the standard osteotomy. An ideal osteotomy plane was then created for each specimen and the distance from the cartilage/metaphyseal interface determined, identifying points of least deviation. The reference points were used to simulate a new osteotomy for which retroversion was calculated. The novel osteotomy and traditional osteotomy were compared to the normal geometry.

The mean retroversion for the normal geometry was 18.5±9.0 degrees. The mean retroversion for the traditional osteotomy technique was 29.5±10.7 degrees, significantly different from the original (p<0.001). The mean retroversion using the novel osteotomy was 18.9±8.9 degrees and similar to the normal geometry (p=0.528).

The traditional osteotomy resulted in a mean increase in retroversion of 38%. The increase in version may result in eccentric loading at the glenoid and alter rotator cuff balance. The novel osteotomy resulted in more accurate recovery of head geometry and may improve clinical outcome.