There has been little research into the effect of suffering a simultaneous hip and upper limb fragility fracture. The aim of this study is to describe the characteristics of this important group of patients and to define the effect on outcomes such as mortality and length of stay. Hip fracture data in our unit is collected prospectively and entered into a database. All study data was taken from this database. Patients under 60 years of age were excluded from the study.Introduction
Materials and methods
Prospective data on 6905 consecutive hip fracture
patients at a district general hospital were analysed to identify the
risk factors for the development of deep infection post-operatively.
The main outcome measure was infection beneath the fascia lata. A total of 50 patients (0.7%) had deep infection. Operations
by consultants or a specialist hip fracture surgeon had half the
rate of deep infection compared with junior grades (p = 0.01). Increased
duration of anaesthesia was significantly associated with deep infection
(p = 0.01). The method of fracture fixation was also significant. Intracapsular
fractures treated with a hemiarthroplasty had seven times the rate
of deep infection compared with those treated by internal fixation
(p = 0.001). Extracapsular fractures treated with an extramedullary
device had a deep infection rate of 0.78% compared with 0% for those
treated with intramedullary devices (p = 0.02). The management of hip fracture patients by a specialist hip fracture
surgeon using appropriate fixation could significantly reduce the
rate of deep infection and associated morbidity, along with extended
hospitalisation and associated costs.
