We undertook a retrospective study investigating
the accuracy and safety of percutaneous pedicle screws placed under
fluoroscopic guidance in the lumbosacral junction and lumbar spine.
The CT scans of patients were chosen from two centres: European
patients from University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany,
and Asian patients from the University of Malaya, Malaysia. Screw
perforations were classified into grades 0, 1, 2 and 3. A total
of 880 percutaneous pedicle screws from 203 patients were analysed:
614 screws from 144 European patients and 266 screws from 59 Asian
patients. The mean age of the patients was 58.8 years (16 to 91)
and there were 103 men and 100 women. The total rate of perforation
was 9.9% (87 screws) with 7.4% grade 1, 2.0% grade 2 and 0.5% grade
3 perforations. The rate of perforation in Europeans was 10.4% and
in Asians was 8.6%, with no significant difference between the two
(p = 0.42). The rate of perforation was the highest in S1 (19.4%)
followed by L5 (14.9%). The accuracy and safety of percutaneous
pedicle screw placement are comparable to those cited in the literature
for the open method of pedicle screw placement. Greater caution
must be taken during the insertion of L5 and S1 percutaneous pedicle
screws owing to their more angulated pedicles, the anatomical variations
in their vertebral bodies and the morphology of the spinal canal
at this location. Cite this article:
From a mechanical point of view, the clinical use of pedicle screws in the atlas is a promising alternative to lateral mass screws due to an increased biomechanical fixation. The most established surgical technique for posterior screw fixation in the atlas (C1) is realised by screw placement through the lateral mass [1]. This surgical placement may lead to extended bleeding from the paravertebral venous plexus as well as a violation of the axis (C2) nerve roots [1]. Using pedicle screws is an emerging technique which utilises the canal passing through the posterior arch enabling the use of longer screws with a greater contact area while avoiding the venous plexus and axis nerve roots. The aim of this Summary Statement
Introduction