Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 189 - 189
1 May 2011
Hailer Y Montgomery S Ekbom A Nilsson O Bahmanyar S
Full Access

Backround: The etiology of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCPD) is incompletely understood. Previous studies suggest associations with coagulation problems, anatomical abnormalities in the femoral head blood supply and risks for cardiovascular disease. Therefore, we hypothesized that patients with LCPD might have a higher risk of cardiovascular diseases and diseases of blood and blood-forming organs.

Methods: 3,141 patients with LCPD aged 2–15 years, diagnosed between 1965 and 2005 were identified using the Swedish inpatient register. 15,595 individuals without LCPD were randomly selected from among the Swedish general population, matched by year of birth, age, sex, and region of residence. Cox proportional hazard regression, adjusted for socioeconomic index, was used to estimate the relative risks. The patients were also compared with their same-sex siblings.

Results: Patients with LCPD had a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.70 (95% CI 1.39–2.09) for cardiovascular disease compared with individuals without LCPD. The point estimate was slightly higher among those older than 30 at follow-up (HR=2.10, 95% CI: 1.52–2.91). There were statistically significant higher risks for diseases of blood and blood-forming organs (1.41, 1.07–1.86), which were more pronounced among those older than 30 years at follow-up (2.70. 1.50–4.84). Patients had also statistically significant higher risks for hypertensive disease (2.97, 1.87–4.72), and nutritional anemia (2.92, 1.58–5.40). When siblings were used as the comparison group, the results were consistent for cardiovascular disease.

Conclusion: The results are consistent with the hypothesis that an insufficient blood supply to the femoral head due to vascular pathology and other causes are involved in the etiology of LCPD.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 91-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 175 - 176
1 Mar 2009
Hailer Y Olgun G Zichner L Schäfer V
Full Access

Aim of the study: Joint infection and infection of arthroplasty is a severe problem and its treatment controversial. Treatment with irrigation-suction-drain is still common. We investigated the outcome of this method.

Patients and method: In a retrospective trial, 129 patients with infection of the hip-, knee- and shoulder joint were included. 28 of these patients had an infected hip, knee or shoulder prosthesis.

The mean follow up was 5 years. Patients with rheumatic disease, tumors or patients under immunosuppressive therapy were excluded. Infectious disease consultants supervised the administration of intravenous antibiotics. No antibiotics were added to the irrigating solution.

Results: In 44, 6% of the patient group with septic arthritis the infection could not be eradicated with open surgical debridement and irrigation-suction drainage treatment. In the arthroplasty group 39, 3% were not cured. In total 55 patients underwent additional surgery once or several times to get the infection under control. In 9 of the 28 patient with arthroplasty, the prosthesis had to be removed. The predominant infectious organisms were gram-positive (Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus Group B). Three percent of the knees that were infected clinically had no organisms that could be identified. In 78, 2% of the patients who had additional surgery the antibiogram showed a change in the resistance or/and a change of the pathogen microorganism. Four patients developed a MRSA. The mean duration in the hospital stay was 36 days.

Conclusion: The treatment with irrigation-suction-drain is not recommended according to these results. Other methods like debridement and local antibiotics in combination with systemic antibiotics seams to be more effective according to the literature. Even the duration of the hospital stay is shorter with other methods. The high rate of microorganism changes and changes in the resistance of the microorganism is not acceptable.